[Zelphyr]

In truth, it's usually the opposite when our bodies are fueled properly.

[hansvm]

I thought I remembered something about certain nutrients (magnesium?) being something you could intentionally reduce to slow down cancer growth -- kind of like a DIY chemotherapy; your cells need Mg to grow and multiply, but cancer cells need it more. Paired with other treatments, where applicable, the reduced nutrient diet had positive clinical outcomes.

[parineum]

Define "quality nutrition" and cite a source.

[fhieufn]

"Quality nutrition" is any scientifically backed research results on good health.

Here is a resource that uses research to back up its claims: https://www.efsa.europa.eu/en/topics/topic/dietary-reference...

And it has a good tool to find and meet those results: https://multimedia.efsa.europa.eu/drvs/index.htm

[bitcoin_anon]

My health has been improving by eating according to this book:

https://a.co/d/2dHgtQr

[nradov]

Really? Most clinical trials for nutritional therapy as a cancer treatment haven't produced significant results.

[fhieufn]

This is a surprising position.

Can you link to any?

Everything I have read on the subject says obesity, a nutritional imbalance, is one of the main contributors to cancer growth, and specifically a reduction in sugar and meat have significant positive results in combating cancer's growth.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9559313/

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9775518/

https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/0470869976....