> They had the option to license the WordPress trademark for 8% of their revenue, which could be delivered either as payments, people (Five for the Future .org commitments), or any combination of the above.
So they could have "paid" by just hiring a few WordPress devs to work on it. That is: not necessarily by transferring dollars to Automattic.
IMHO this is an important bit of nuance missing in this thread.
There are things in that WPE C&D that make me question how candid they're being; for instance, the trademark dispute seems an awful lot more complicated than the letters "W" and "P".
Out of five board members, one is Matt, one was the CEO of Automattic before Matt took over the role, and a third was an early investor. The other two are harder to pin down.
mthoms|1 year ago
Automattic is Matt's private, for-profit company and a direct competitor to WPE.
arp242|1 year ago
> They had the option to license the WordPress trademark for 8% of their revenue, which could be delivered either as payments, people (Five for the Future .org commitments), or any combination of the above.
So they could have "paid" by just hiring a few WordPress devs to work on it. That is: not necessarily by transferring dollars to Automattic.
IMHO this is an important bit of nuance missing in this thread.
slouch|1 year ago
tptacek|1 year ago
deepfriedchokes|1 year ago
mintplant|1 year ago
3np|1 year ago
chuckadams|1 year ago
duskwuff|1 year ago
https://automattic.com/board/
gibrown|1 year ago