[brvsft]

If an "artist" or "thinker" stops because of this, I question their motivations and those labels in the first place.

[ceejayoz]

Everyone tends to have "be able to afford basic necessities" as a major motivation. That includes people who work in creative fields.

[Drakim]

Several of the agricultural revolutions we went though is what freed up humanity to not spend all of it's work producing sustenance, leaving time for other professions like making art and music. But it also destroyed a lot of jobs for people who were necessary for gathering food the old inefficient way.

If we take your argument to it's logical conclusion, all progress is inherently bad, and should be stopped.

I deposit instead that the real problem is that we tied people's ability to afford basic necessities to how much output they can produce as a cog in our societal machine.

[bayindirh]

After Instagram started feeding user photos to their AI models, I stopped adding new photos to my profile. I still take photos. I wonder about your thoughts about my motivation.

[esafak]

They might be motivated to pay their bills. Weird people.

[brvsft]

Right, people were trying to 'pay their bills' with content that was freely shared such that AI could take advantage of it. Weird people.

Or we're all talking about and envisioning some specific little subset of artists. I suspect you're trying to pretend that someone with a literal set of paintbrushes living in a shitty loft is somehow having their original artwork stolen by AI despite no high resolution photography of it existing on the internet. I'm not falling for that. Be more specific about which artists are losing their livelihoods.

[consteval]

Considering you're not much of an artist or thinker yourself, I'm not sure your questioning has much value.