top | item 41663033

(no title)

ursuscamp | 1 year ago

>But blocking links to hacked documents regarding JD Vance seems a little suspect considering that, as the article mentions, he was opposed to blocking links to hacked documents about Hunter Biden

Per X, the links were blocked because they included un-redacted personal information such as address and SSN.

discuss

order

orochimaaru|1 year ago

If that’s true I would say blocking is credible. I’d rather err on the side of caution on exposing potential privacy information.

If there was no private info - obviously the block is b.s. But considering they’ve mentioned privacy details in the doc I’m prepared to give them the benefit of doubt for a few days or ask the initial poster to send a redacted version.

SpicyLemonZest|1 year ago

I'm not gonna spend an hour poring over the thing for an SSN, but it does have his unredacted home addresses in both Ohio and DC.

slantedview|1 year ago

His address is public info, available on dozens of state and local election sites.

For comparison, Elon previously leaked "the Twitter files" to reporter Matt Taibbi, who posted the address of prior Twitter executives. Needless to say, Taibbi was not banned.

FergusArgyll|1 year ago

I couldn't find an SSN but my regex is mid

blitzar|1 year ago

Per Elon, photos of Hunter Bidens penis was a public interest story.