(no title)
rmac | 1 year ago
Yet another reminder. What happens when you have organizations that aren't beholden to outside pressure
rmac | 1 year ago
Yet another reminder. What happens when you have organizations that aren't beholden to outside pressure
idunnoman1222|1 year ago
https://www.ntia.gov/sites/default/files/publications/januar...
spwestwood|1 year ago
pooper|1 year ago
JumpCrisscross|1 year ago
This is a silly line to draw. In an existential conflict, the military gets what it wants. Commandeering spectrum would be a basic part of war powers; we’ve done it before and would do it again for stakes much lower than an invasion of the homeland [1].
So the practical value of such a proposal is in messaging. Given the threshold wouldn’t have covered the attacks on Pearl Harbor, 9/11 or even a nuclear first strike, the only thing messaged is unreasonableness.
Put another way, were I a lobbyist for the military to the Congress, I would want someone to propose this language. Because it lets one brand, with a laugh, the entire effort as being as ridiculous as the caveat.
[1] https://www.smithsonianmag.com/history/us-confiscated-half-b...
edm0nd|1 year ago
throwaway48476|1 year ago
SV_BubbleTime|1 year ago