(no title)
sponno | 1 year ago
I built a complete platform over the past 3 years, that doesn't require a subscription and you only pay for what you send. Give it a go if you need to send a document that needs to be signed.
sponno | 1 year ago
I built a complete platform over the past 3 years, that doesn't require a subscription and you only pay for what you send. Give it a go if you need to send a document that needs to be signed.
xiconfjs|1 year ago
https://up2store.de/file/4RpE3Q2fuK8Dj4S4/kjcZbp9k8srjpcx8/I...
https://up2store.de/file/4RpE3Q2fuK8Dj4S4/o71komFm2AoTGjvU/I...
sponno|1 year ago
idk1|1 year ago
sponno|1 year ago
The others just have a document limit, eg Docusign has a 100 document limit per user. Docusign has a really high cost per user (I don't charge for users, only for sends).
So it is harder to compare apples with apples – at the end of the day GoodSign is just that simple. $1.50 per send, unlimited users : )
I choose 6 – because that's about the typical team size I see with GoodSign. So that feels like a good comparison.
Thanks for pointing the pricing out - it really is that terrible! Hence why I built a product I would buy and I could understand. : )
john01dav|1 year ago
KolmogorovComp|1 year ago
> It needs to be comparable to just printing the document and signing with pens
When you factor in the price of buying a printer, and move the printed doc around for multiple persons to sign, it is comparable if not cheaper.
[0] https://goodsign.io
sssilver|1 year ago
What do web apps like DocuSign offer that Preview doesn’t?
paranoidrobot|1 year ago
chirau|1 year ago
Great job all the same, this is nice.
sponno|1 year ago
GoodSign works really well for multiple signers, employment contracts and small to medium startups that are want a better signing tool and document management - but don't feel like the high prices of other tools is justified.
rexreed|1 year ago
EasyMark|1 year ago