(no title)
svl | 1 year ago
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:roundabout%3Dturbo
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roundabout#Turbo_roundabouts
https://www.arcadis.com/en-us/knowledge-hub/blog/united-stat...
svl | 1 year ago
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:roundabout%3Dturbo
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roundabout#Turbo_roundabouts
https://www.arcadis.com/en-us/knowledge-hub/blog/united-stat...
asib|1 year ago
The "turbo roundabout" might make this explicit, but it's not different.
Etheryte|1 year ago
zamadatix|1 year ago
E.g. a standard 2-lane by 2-lane roundabout intersection may just as well look like this https://i.imgur.com/jqhMxW4.jpeg. Note the entrance markings allowing all lanes to go straight with 1 alternative turn direction per lane choice, the exit markings allowing dual lane exits in all directions, and internal markings allowing u-turns (the roads in this case have medians farther out). It has some of the downsides you mention but also some upsides in exchange for allowing slightly more lane flexibility. Regardless, you're definitely not supposed to follow the turbo's rules in that roundabout.
Now you could "no true Scotsman" it and say all the other roundabout types aren't roundabouts because they are supposed to be like turbo roundabouts to be so... but that still leaves needing the distinction in types, for which everyone calls one a turbo roundabout and other variations different types of roundabout.
tda|1 year ago
jen729w|1 year ago
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magic_Roundabout_(Hemel_Hempst...
alt227|1 year ago
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magic_Roundabout_(Swindon)