(no title)
Lonestar1440 | 1 year ago
I saw a lot of people dismiss the ban bill out of hand after it was signed. However, I see a lot lining up against them:
1) Flat out refusal by the parent company to sell both strengthens the USG's case and cuts off a major 'win-win' outcome that could otherwise save them
2) The fact that they're the only major foreign owned social media company in the whole pool. This means that USG has far more latitude, legally and politically, to go after them then any other major platform.
3) The zeitgeist shifting away from Social Media in general, as seen in these lawsuits and just in... the world lately.
I could be wrong but I'd definitely bet on it.
datarespecter|1 year ago
JumpCrisscross|1 year ago
Forced sale to stay in the country is the same as forced JV to enter. Most media markets have, historically, been regulated with respect to foreign ownership.
Lonestar1440|1 year ago
ClumsyPilot|1 year ago
Kind of out a big question mark over ‘free and fair competition’ thing.
JumpCrisscross|1 year ago
Eh, they'll still be on TikTok.com. Keep in mind, too, that the app store monopolies are being dismantled.
Lonestar1440|1 year ago
I do think that an App Store ban would be an effective tool. I don't think that average consumers would use the .com, over YT shorts or threads or whatever.