(no title)
dx034
|
1 year ago
Since most applications aren't latency sensitive, space and power can be nearly free by setting up the data center in a place where it's cold, there's nearly free electricity and few people live. Leaves you with cost for infrastructure and connectivity, but I guess electricity prices shouldn't be the issue?
tonetegeatinst|1 year ago
In rural areas or even with low population it takes forever to get fiber to roll out and if your selling access to your hardware infrastructure then you really want to get a direct connection to the nearest IX so you can offer customers the best speed for accessing data and the IX would probably be one of the few places you might be able to get 400G or higher direct fiber. But if your hooking up to a IX chances are your not an end user but a autonomous system and already are shoving moving and signing NDA's to be a peer with other Autonomous Systems in the exchange and be able to bgp announce.
(Source - my old highschool networking class where I got sick of my shitty internet and looked into how I could get fiber from an exchange. I'm probably mistaken on stuff here as it was years ago and its either wrong or outdated from all those years ago.)
oasisbob|1 year ago
In NW Washington state at least, the rural counties (Whatcom, Island, Skagit, etc) have had a robust market in dark fiber for over two decades.
The normal telcos weren't responsive to need, so private carriers picked up the slack. When I was last involved in this market, you could get a P2P strand, including reasonable buildout, for less than a cost of a T1 line with a two-year commit.
The tiny four-branch credit union I worked for had dedicated fiber loops between all our locations, no big deal. It was great.
serjester|1 year ago
pie420|1 year ago
Surely someone in the trillion dollar datacenter industry can figure out a way to take waste heat and use it in a profitable way, right?