(no title)
eointierney | 1 year ago
Tongue-no-longer-in-cheek:
I reckon the C core of Emacs is some of the most battle-hardened code out there. Verification, a-la SEL4, is probably irrelevant but still nice. Guile is modern and performant but Elisp is still its own little joy. Literate programming is always nice until it gets in the way. Straight is good enough for me now. Macros are always cool and a leaderboard would be fun, but patch algebra is really nice, see jujutsu nowadays. And beard length is gendered and so only partially admissable. Infinity categories are way out there and always good for a reference.
fsckboy|1 year ago
you insensitive clod
https://www.gocomics.com/calvinandhobbes/1986/02/14
eointierney|1 year ago
denotational|1 year ago
neilv|1 year ago
sshine|1 year ago
Since I agreed with all of these, I’ll add some more non-ironic, idealistic wishes:
Plugins must be written in sandboxed WebAssembly so you can know what a plugin is capable of without reading the source code. The runtime must be portable so it can run in wasm32-wasi.
mdaniel|1 year ago
for the non-tongue-in-cheek, also relevant: https://www.emacswiki.org/emacs/GuileEmacs#h5o-2
mech422|1 year ago
I'm looking at pijul..
https://pijul.org/
eddieh|1 year ago
Though, not to put too fine a point on it, I know it was in jest, but the core implementation language is the least of my concerns. As long as it is extremely portable, compiles fast, and runs on virtually anything, then whatever the core is, doesn’t matter much to me.