top | item 41826750

(no title)

batuhanicoz | 1 year ago

Our attempts at resolving trademark issues with WPE predate our discovery of the attribution removal.

discuss

order

closewith|1 year ago

Who is our in this context?

If you are a party to this dispute, why on Earth would you comment publicly?

Kye|1 year ago

It really is strange Automattic's lawyers haven't clamped down on any public comment. Have any of WP Engine's people been as free with commentary as Automattic employees have been?

If I were an employee at a company being sued I wouldn't say anything related to it even without an order from legal because I wouldn't want to have to risk answering for it in the trial. Why dangle yourself out there as a target for the opposition's lawyers?

thih9|1 year ago

What do you mean by “trademark issues”? Is this about the WP in the WPEngine’s name? If yes, what about other companies in a similar position?

kgeist|1 year ago

The abbreviation "WP" was initially permitted for use before they retroactively changed it a few days ago. Saying "We host WordPress" on WPEngine's site constitutes as much trademark violation as a random shoe shop listing Nike shoes in their catalog. It seems this is more about attempting to undermine a competitor, with trademark issues serving merely as an excuse.