(no title)
lquist
|
1 year ago
What does Starship reusability mean for $/kg to LEO? I know there are longer term targets of $10/kg but that supposes efficiencies that aren’t here yet. Would be helpful to understand before Starship reusability where the state of the art was in terms of $/kg to LEO and where we would be with impending Starship reusability.
augusto-moura|1 year ago
People say 200$/kg just with booster reuse, and 20$/kg with full reuse. Of course this might be too optimistic, but I truly believe we might reach under 50$ in this decade.
quotemstr|1 year ago
moffkalast|1 year ago
jackcviers3|1 year ago
asadotzler|1 year ago
TMWNN|1 year ago
On the civilian side, SpaceX saved NASA $2 billion for just one payload, Europa Clipper <https://arstechnica.com/space/2023/10/a-year-from-launch-the...>, so who knows how many billions more from other launches.
55555|1 year ago
thinkcontext|1 year ago
acover|1 year ago
JumpCrisscross|1 year ago
All we can say is under $1,000/kg. Which is conservative, that limit being about two thirds that of Falcon Heavy’s theoretical cost to LEO in a reüsable configuration.
thinkcontext|1 year ago