(no title)
squeek502 | 1 year ago
It's always theoretically possible that someone, somewhere is somehow relying on such a miscompilation, but for many of the ones detailed in the article, it seems extraordinarily unlikely.
squeek502 | 1 year ago
It's always theoretically possible that someone, somewhere is somehow relying on such a miscompilation, but for many of the ones detailed in the article, it seems extraordinarily unlikely.
sigseg1v|1 year ago
[deleted]