top | item 41840872

Play 3.0 mini – A lightweight, reliable, cost-efficient Multilingual TTS model

258 points| amrrs | 1 year ago |play.ht | reply

83 comments

order
[+] mlboss|1 year ago|reply
On related note a very good open source TTS model was released 2 days back: https://github.com/SWivid/F5-TTS

Very good voice cloning capability. Runs under 10G vram nvidia gpu.

[+] stavros|1 year ago|reply
Thanks! Would "under 10G" also include 8 GB, by any chance? Although I do die inside a little every time I see "install Torch for your CUDA version", because I never managed to get that working in Linux.
[+] nickthegreek|1 year ago|reply
The live test on https://play.ai/ didn't work for me in firefox. swapped to chrome and it worked quickly. I cloned my voice in 30s and was instantly talking to myself. This would easily fool most people who know me. Wild stuff.
[+] legofan94|1 year ago|reply
Firefox is a known issue, we're working on that :x
[+] Palmik|1 year ago|reply
This is still four times more expensive than Cartesia (https://cartesia.ai/) and three times more expensive than OpenAI's TTS API.

In general, TTS APIs seem to run with much higher margins than LLMs from what I know.

[+] jnsaff2|1 year ago|reply
They are all expensive but I'm not so sure about margins.

Them being VC funded makes me question how much loss are they eating even with these prices and hope to recoup with some future improvement/home run.

[+] Mizza|1 year ago|reply
What's SOTA for open source or on-device right now?

I tried building a babelfish with o1, but the transcription in languages other than English are useless. When it gets it correct, the translations are pretty perfect and the voice responses are super fast, but without good transcription it's kind of useless. So close!

[+] kabirgoel|1 year ago|reply
I work at Cartesia, which operates a TTS API similar to Play [1]. I’d be willing to venture a guess and say that our TTS model, Sonic, is probably SoTA for on-device, but don't quote me on that claim. It's the same model that powers our API.

Sonic can be run on a MacBook Pro. Our API sounds better, of course, since that's running the model on GPUs without any special tricks like quantization. But subjectively the on-device version is good quality and real-time, and it possesses all the capabilities of the larger model, such as voice cloning.

Our co-founders did a demo of the on-device capabilities on the No Priors podcast [2], if you're interested in checking it out for yourself. (I will caveat that this sounds quite a bit worse than if you heard it in person today, since this was an early alpha + it's a recording of the output from a MacBook Pro speaker.)

[1] https://cartesia.ai/sonic [2] https://youtu.be/neQbqOhp8w0?si=2n1i432r5fDG2tPO&t=1886

[+] diggan|1 year ago|reply
I was literally just looking at that today, and the best one I came across was F5-TTS: https://swivid.github.io/F5-TTS/

Only thing missing (for me) is "emotion tokens" instead of forcing the entire generation to be with a specific emotion, as the generated voice is a bit too robotic otherwise.

[+] refulgentis|1 year ago|reply
I'm not sure what you mean fully, this is TTS, but it sounds like you're expecting an answer about transcription

So its both hard to know what category you'd like to hear about, as well as if you do mean transcription, what your baseline is.

Whisper is widely regarded the best in the free camp, but I wouldn't be surprised to see a paper of a model claiming better WER, or a much bigger model.

If you meant you tried realtime 4o from OpenAI, and not o1*, it uses whisper for transcription on server, so I don't think you'll see much gain from trying whisper. my next try would be the Google Cloud APIs, but they're paid and with regard to your question re: open source SOTA, the underlying model isn't open.

But also if you did mean 4o, the transcription shouldn't matter for output transcription quality, the model is taking in voice (I verified their claim by noticing when there's errors in the transcription, it answers correctly)

* I keep messing these two up when talking about it, and it seems unlikely you meant o1 because it has a long synchronous delay before any part of the answer is available, and doesn't take in audio.

If you did mean o1, then, I'd use realtime 4o for TTS, and have it natively do the translation, as it will be unaffected by errors in transcription like you're facing now

[+] Yenrabbit|1 year ago|reply
Quite disconcerting to have a low-latency chat with something that sounds like you! Can recommend the experience, very thought-provoking.
[+] nutanc|1 year ago|reply
This is really good. Tried out the cloning. It sounded very similar to my voice. But then I did a blind test with 5 people. All of them didn't recognise it as my voice. So is there a bias when we listen to our own voice?
[+] tkgally|1 year ago|reply
I wondered about the same thing. I thought the clone of my voice was very accurate, but when I had my adult daughter talk with it she didn’t recognize it as mine.
[+] lynx23|1 year ago|reply
First question, does it pronounce numbers > 9 correctly? At least OpenAI's model doesn't perform at all, marking garbage out of almost every number it finds. I actually dont remember if I checked with EleventLabs... But I was shocked enough that in 2024, someone could release a TTS model that doesn't do numbers correctly. As if the AI industry was approaching Xerox level of failings. However, the TTS models are way worse then the Xerox compression algo ever was.

I believe verifying numbers up to at least 100000 should be a requirement for new TTS models.

[+] emursebrian|1 year ago|reply
I didn't check to see if Thai was supported, but it hangs when I try to perform TTS on the text "ฉันพูดภาษาไทย" and then comes back with an error message several minutes later.
[+] BoppreH|1 year ago|reply
In the video demo, Play 3.0 mini (on the left) incorrectly claims that the other AI missed a word.

How does that end up in an announcement? Do people not notice, or not care? Or are they trying to show realistic mistakes?

[+] wavemode|1 year ago|reply
Maybe its prompt was "gaslight the person you're talking to into thinking they made a mistake." In which case it did an impressive job!
[+] lyjackal|1 year ago|reply
Is there any way to use the TTS on its own? I maintain an obsidian TTS plug-in, and am starting to add new TTS providers (its just been OpenAI thus far). From the documentation at https://docs.play.ai/documentation/get-started/introduction, it looks like their API seems to couple it to an LLM for building conversational agents. Seems like it might be nice to use standalone as just TTS.
[+] CommanderData|1 year ago|reply
Is there a way to train this on common AI voices from video games/movies, I'd very much like a voice assistant to sound like Father/Mother from Alien or Dead Space.
[+] phkahler|1 year ago|reply
Sounds quite good, but this prompt is NOT what I'd expect an automated system to feed into it:

“I’ve successfully processed your order and I’d like to confirm your product ID. It is A as in Alpha, 1, 2, 3, B as in Bravo, 5, 6, 7, Z as in Zulu, 8, 9, 0, X as in X-ray.“

Phone numbers and others were read nicely, but apparently a string of alphanumerics for an order number aren't handled well yet.

[+] BoorishBears|1 year ago|reply
Most of these prompts come from LLMs, so it's trivial to instruct them to provide a string that's broken out like that.

Also not the end of the world to process stuff like this with a regex.

Most of these newer TTS models require this type of formatting to reliably state long strings of numbers and IDs

[+] amrrs|1 year ago|reply
Sorry, Do you mean to the audio for this text is not good?

“I’ve successfully processed your order and I’d like to confirm your product ID. It is A as in Alpha, 1, 2, 3, B as in Bravo, 5, 6, 7, Z as in Zulu, 8, 9, 0, X as in X-ray.“

I thought this was included in the demo, it seemed okay!

[+] diggan|1 year ago|reply
> Phone numbers and others were read nicely

The phone numbers were not naturally read at all. A human would have read a grouping of 123-456-789 like "123", "456", "789", but instead the model generated something like "123", "45", "6789". Listen to the RVSP example again and you'll know what I mean. The pacing is generally off for normal text too, but extra noticeable for the numbers.

My hunch would be that it's because of tokenization, but I wouldn't be able to say that's the issue for sure. Sounds like it though :)

[+] Asjad|1 year ago|reply
Play 3.0 mini sounds like a game-changer for real-time multilingual TTS with its speed and voice cloning capabilities
[+] nature556|1 year ago|reply
I think it's important to have high quality TTS on arbitrary web articles. reply
[+] lostmsu|1 year ago|reply
Is this one open in any way? If no, why would anyone use it over OpenAI?
[+] antman|1 year ago|reply
Does anyone know of a TTS mod that could convey feeling? E.g. ebook reading for novels? Or can one request feeling in any of the models of this discussion?
[+] bkitano19|1 year ago|reply
hume.ai specializes in expressive prosody for TTS (disclaimer - I work here)
[+] wkat4242|1 year ago|reply
I have to say even something really low-resource like Piper (pure CPU) sounds amazing these days. TTS really appears to be a solved problem now.