I can swear something like 20+ years ago I found a new one too, but I didn’t realize the importance of it. I had just downloaded GIMPS and I was just messing around with it, and when I saw the message I thought “ok, cool!” and proceeded to turn it off.
If this happened the way you remember, it's really unfortunate, but it wouldn't have stopped the prime in question from being discovered, because GIMPS always at least eventually gives out numbers to multiple people to check, and doesn't mark Mersenne numbers as checked until a computer actively reports that they were checked.
However, your name could have ended up on that Wikipedia list as a discoverer. :-)
I'd believe it. Many years ago when I was around 10 years old and not understanding the concept of probability properly, I decided I had come up with a way to enumerate the lottery numbers and come up with a reasonably sized set of numbers to place bets for. I proceeded to write 9 pages of numbers for my father to place bets for. It is a 6/49 lottery so 6 balls are drawn from a set of 49 and you need to get all of them right to get the jackpot.
It would have cost a little under 95$ to have played all my numbers (for a jackpot around $1.5M) I gave him however it would have taken a lot of effort to manually enter them. My father just does one page because it is silly. The numbers are silly, everything about this is silly. I completely understand in hindsight. But it turned out page 7 had the winning combination.
I thought this was about GIMP at first, the GNU Image Manipulation Program. Like did they hide a prime number check into the brush strokes algorithm so users would become pseudorandom generators whenever they made art...? And you just happened to draw the right thing that also happened to be a prime?
> I had just downloaded GIMPS and I was just messing around with it, and when I saw the message I thought “ok, cool!” and proceeded to turn it off.
GIMPS would run for weeks or months first. You wouldn’t have seen anything if you had just downloaded it and were messing around. As I recall, you had to do some work to get it running at boot automatically.
Do you have any slightest idea about the exponent, including how many digits in the exponent? I assume you had no account (otherwise there should have been some logs for that).
I use to run Mersenne Prime Search (GIMPS), but now all I have is laptops. It runs to hot on the Laptops I have :(
Will need to play with throttling some more.
Edit: found mprime (mprime-bin-24.14) is available in NetBSD pkgsrc. But this uses 32 bit linux emulation to execute, I have been trying to avoid it, but may try it.
Awesome. I have been recommending in my organization, 24 Hrs. Prime95 Stress Test as part of acceptance protocol for all new servers ! Happy to see it find another record Mersenne Prime.
Given this contest can presumably go on infinitely long, what is the ultimate point of the contest? Is there some kind of theoretical or practical benefit to discovering a new Mersenne prime?
The EFF Cooperative Computing Awards, which pay out money for (four specific sizes of) prime records, were meant to show off how the Internet is useful for letting people who don't even know each other work together to solve problems. They were established back in 1998, when people in general were much less familiar with the Internet and its impact. That specific contest isn't set up to go on forever, as it ends when a billion-digit prime is discovered.
The search for different kinds of mathematical objects sometimes has applications and sometimes doesn't. For example, apparently the search for Golomb rulers (another distributed computing project) has some conceivable applications.
There's a misconception (that I heard dozens or hundreds of times when I was running the Cooperative Computing Awards at EFF) that discovering world record primes is useful to cryptography. In fact, it has no direct application because all of the primes used in number-theoretic algorithms like RSA and classic Diffie-Hellman are dramatically smaller than world-record sizes, and can be generated on an ordinary PC in seconds. (Try "openssl prime -generate -bits 2048" at your command line!)
(There is a wild paper from 2017 called "Post-quantum RSA" arguing that we could in principle just scale up RSA keys for post-quantum security, but that paper uses multiprime RSA moduli composed of large numbers of 4096-bit primes, instead of just the traditional two primes, so even that approach doesn't require individual primes that are especially large or hard-to-find by computer standards.)
We have apparently learned a bit about number theory and algorithms as a result of research done by the GIMPS project and its collaborators about how to optimize some of the arithmetic in the GIMPS client. I guess that's the equivalent of the claim that the space program produced various spin-off technologies while pursuing space exploration.
In general, since there are infinitely many primes, there's no reason that humanity can't keep looking for larger and larger ones indefinitely. Likewise for many other searches, both for objects which are known to be infinitely numerous and objects which may or may not have a largest example. Mostly this kind of activity has a "because it's there" flavor to it.
Research mathematicians are mostly not that excited about this activity, because it isn't generating more understanding or hypotheses about mathematical structure. They're usually more excited about insights that reveal or hint at new patterns or structure, which searching for large primes doesn't really do (most of the work is mechanical, performed by computers, and the outputs aren't very surprising or suggestive in a mathematical sense).
I've hoped that publicity about discoveries like record primes might get more young people interested in mathematics (and maybe about topics like number theory and discrete math that they might not be encountering in school). I got kind of a sad view of this because people were constantly writing to me asking for monetary rewards for their inevitably-mistaken-or-confused "discoveries", but I'd like to think that there are also people out there who got curious about what we do and don't know about primes. A good place to start with that is the Prime Pages
the idea of a deep-nation-state-cold-war psyop campaign bluffing and escalating math proofs is so goddamn hilarious, apt, and ironic it would be almost better than the mistake of pissing off the Aliens by offending them with math homework.
"Shizuo Kakutani joked that the problem [Collatz conjecture] was a Cold War invention of the Russians meant to slow the progress of mathematics in the West."
Because the EFF Cooperative Computing Awards for the first discovery of large enough prime numbers are still active. Publishing the probable prime in advance would risk someone verifying faster than GIMPS.
Are there statistics on the scale of compute available to GIMPS for this search? Is there any evidence that by crowdsourcing the clients, we are searching faster than, eg, a dedicated cluster financed by a government or a corporation? What is the impact of GIMPS as a distributed problem solving tool? Like, if there was a practical application, how much money would it take to exceed GIMPS throughput, that curious people provide for free?
I’d like it to be astronomical, but given the niche of this, and the low cost of cloud compute, the answer is predicable depressing, like, “$50k/year in AWS costs would equal current GIMPS search throughput”
I used a random estimate online for computing cost which had 5.6e17 Flops per dollar on A100s gives about a dollar every 4.4 seconds or ~$7 million per year.
Sadly, I do not vouch for the correctness of any part of this, though I did try.
So I prefer to shorten the definition to "A prime of the form 2ⁿ-1". It’s bloody useful that n has to be prime though: makes searching that much faster.
Anyone have a sense of how much money/electrical power is being spent to discover these primes? I'm not about to argue for bitcoin calculations over this, I'm just curious how it compares.
I always wondered if we could parallelize a prime test on GPU. That would give us a Datacenter level compute and really help us scale, but it might be too hard to do.
[+] [-] ziofill|1 year ago|reply
[+] [-] schoen|1 year ago|reply
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Mersenne_primes_and_pe...
If this happened the way you remember, it's really unfortunate, but it wouldn't have stopped the prime in question from being discovered, because GIMPS always at least eventually gives out numbers to multiple people to check, and doesn't mark Mersenne numbers as checked until a computer actively reports that they were checked.
However, your name could have ended up on that Wikipedia list as a discoverer. :-)
[+] [-] therein|1 year ago|reply
It would have cost a little under 95$ to have played all my numbers (for a jackpot around $1.5M) I gave him however it would have taken a lot of effort to manually enter them. My father just does one page because it is silly. The numbers are silly, everything about this is silly. I completely understand in hindsight. But it turned out page 7 had the winning combination.
[+] [-] solardev|1 year ago|reply
But nope, it's just a similar acronym! https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_Internet_Mersenne_Prime_...
[+] [-] rollinDyno|1 year ago|reply
[+] [-] Aurornis|1 year ago|reply
GIMPS would run for weeks or months first. You wouldn’t have seen anything if you had just downloaded it and were messing around. As I recall, you had to do some work to get it running at boot automatically.
[+] [-] lifthrasiir|1 year ago|reply
[+] [-] dangsux|1 year ago|reply
[deleted]
[+] [-] MPSimmons|1 year ago|reply
[+] [-] schoen|1 year ago|reply
https://www.schneierfacts.com/facts/365
from the "Bruce Schneier Facts" series (which was inspired by the "Chuck Norris Facts").
[+] [-] hinkley|1 year ago|reply
[+] [-] jmclnx|1 year ago|reply
I use to run Mersenne Prime Search (GIMPS), but now all I have is laptops. It runs to hot on the Laptops I have :(
Will need to play with throttling some more.
Edit: found mprime (mprime-bin-24.14) is available in NetBSD pkgsrc. But this uses 32 bit linux emulation to execute, I have been trying to avoid it, but may try it.
[+] [-] jl6|1 year ago|reply
It’s the longest wait for a new mersenne prime since the discovery of M32 in 1992.
[+] [-] noduerme|1 year ago|reply
[+] [-] ramshanker|1 year ago|reply
[+] [-] 0xDEADFED5|1 year ago|reply
[+] [-] dataflow|1 year ago|reply
[+] [-] schoen|1 year ago|reply
The search for different kinds of mathematical objects sometimes has applications and sometimes doesn't. For example, apparently the search for Golomb rulers (another distributed computing project) has some conceivable applications.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Golomb_ruler#Practical_applica...
There's a misconception (that I heard dozens or hundreds of times when I was running the Cooperative Computing Awards at EFF) that discovering world record primes is useful to cryptography. In fact, it has no direct application because all of the primes used in number-theoretic algorithms like RSA and classic Diffie-Hellman are dramatically smaller than world-record sizes, and can be generated on an ordinary PC in seconds. (Try "openssl prime -generate -bits 2048" at your command line!)
(There is a wild paper from 2017 called "Post-quantum RSA" arguing that we could in principle just scale up RSA keys for post-quantum security, but that paper uses multiprime RSA moduli composed of large numbers of 4096-bit primes, instead of just the traditional two primes, so even that approach doesn't require individual primes that are especially large or hard-to-find by computer standards.)
We have apparently learned a bit about number theory and algorithms as a result of research done by the GIMPS project and its collaborators about how to optimize some of the arithmetic in the GIMPS client. I guess that's the equivalent of the claim that the space program produced various spin-off technologies while pursuing space exploration.
In general, since there are infinitely many primes, there's no reason that humanity can't keep looking for larger and larger ones indefinitely. Likewise for many other searches, both for objects which are known to be infinitely numerous and objects which may or may not have a largest example. Mostly this kind of activity has a "because it's there" flavor to it.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/George_Mallory
Research mathematicians are mostly not that excited about this activity, because it isn't generating more understanding or hypotheses about mathematical structure. They're usually more excited about insights that reveal or hint at new patterns or structure, which searching for large primes doesn't really do (most of the work is mechanical, performed by computers, and the outputs aren't very surprising or suggestive in a mathematical sense).
I've hoped that publicity about discoveries like record primes might get more young people interested in mathematics (and maybe about topics like number theory and discrete math that they might not be encountering in school). I got kind of a sad view of this because people were constantly writing to me asking for monetary rewards for their inevitably-mistaken-or-confused "discoveries", but I'd like to think that there are also people out there who got curious about what we do and don't know about primes. A good place to start with that is the Prime Pages
https://t5k.org/
[+] [-] ISL|1 year ago|reply
Perhaps there is a pattern or a way to more-accurately predict which numbers will be prime.
Also, it is cool.
[+] [-] Jerrrrrrry|1 year ago|reply
[+] [-] artursapek|1 year ago|reply
[+] [-] Eliezer|1 year ago|reply
[+] [-] Jerrrrrrry|1 year ago|reply
"Shizuo Kakutani joked that the problem [Collatz conjecture] was a Cold War invention of the Russians meant to slow the progress of mathematics in the West."
[+] [-] jiggawatts|1 year ago|reply
[+] [-] sfelicio|1 year ago|reply
[+] [-] dooglius|1 year ago|reply
[+] [-] lifthrasiir|1 year ago|reply
[+] [-] CamperBob2|1 year ago|reply
[+] [-] p5a0u9l|1 year ago|reply
I’d like it to be astronomical, but given the niche of this, and the low cost of cloud compute, the answer is predicable depressing, like, “$50k/year in AWS costs would equal current GIMPS search throughput”
[+] [-] areyousure|1 year ago|reply
I used a random estimate online for computing cost which had 5.6e17 Flops per dollar on A100s gives about a dollar every 4.4 seconds or ~$7 million per year.
Sadly, I do not vouch for the correctness of any part of this, though I did try.
[+] [-] mpreda|1 year ago|reply
I think you may be wrong by at least 3 orders of magnitude.
[+] [-] potench|1 year ago|reply
M = 2ⁿ - 1
[+] [-] loup-vaillant|1 year ago|reply
So I prefer to shorten the definition to "A prime of the form 2ⁿ-1". It’s bloody useful that n has to be prime though: makes searching that much faster.
[+] [-] stevefan1999|1 year ago|reply
[+] [-] Jabrov|1 year ago|reply
To discover the primes, we have to iterate through the numbers and test their primality. With numbers that are so big, it’s very compute intensive
[+] [-] aaronmdjones|1 year ago|reply
[+] [-] gcanyon|1 year ago|reply
[+] [-] hockyy|1 year ago|reply
[+] [-] sashank_1509|1 year ago|reply
[+] [-] 4gotunameagain|1 year ago|reply
[+] [-] fnord77|1 year ago|reply
[+] [-] benreesman|1 year ago|reply
[+] [-] dudeinjapan|1 year ago|reply
[+] [-] beyondCritics|1 year ago|reply
[+] [-] hyperhello|1 year ago|reply
[+] [-] unknown|1 year ago|reply
[deleted]
[+] [-] natas|1 year ago|reply
[+] [-] toast0|1 year ago|reply
[+] [-] unknown|1 year ago|reply
[deleted]