I wanted to find a reputable source to back up this claim but instead I found a link from the atlantic. I did not read it, its behind a paywall and its not peer reviewed. The general concensus is that smart = subsidized by adware
The link simply states that they make a lot of money from the malware on TVs, something I'm not disputing. I am disputing that if I would buy a TV burn it without ever turning it on they manufacturer would lose money. In essence: The ads are simply pure profit on top of the TV sale.
rowanG077|1 year ago
therealdrag0|1 year ago
gradstudent|1 year ago
Browse to the article, click reader mode, click refresh. Might need to be in a private window, in case of cookie shenanigans.