that's fine, what Im saying is that the above workflow is idealized and you have to do a lot more things overtime. If you look at the happy path it looks similar. With the unhappy path instead of keeping stashes and commiting trash then amending. You describe your change beforehand, and any change you do goes there. Thats it.
Hotfix? jj new main
go back to what you were working on? jj edit refA
need to solve some problems in another pr of youre? jj edit refB.
Theres no overhead at all in thinking these, you can never lose work by mistake, you can never mess it up. It just works
MarceColl|1 year ago
Theres no overhead at all in thinking these, you can never lose work by mistake, you can never mess it up. It just works