Asperger's was not reliably diagnosable between healthcare workers trained to diagnose it. In other words, a diagnosis of Asperger's in someone's medical chart was not a reliable way of knowing if they had Asperger's.
This isn't really providing any clarity to the question, since you're simply restating your previous claim. How is a diagnosis of autism any more reliable?
As in it has a higher inter rater reliability. The statistical term of reliability that is used when describing the likelihood to reproduce a measure under similar conditions.
TeaBrain|1 year ago
NeuroCoder|1 year ago