top | item 41927000 Mojo clarifies meaning of "Python superset" 24 points| CoreyFieldens | 1 year ago |github.com 5 comments order hn newest robinsonrc|1 year ago Not so much 'Clarify meaning of "superset of Python"' as 'Remove references to "superset of Python"' echoangle|1 year ago So it won’t be a real superset, and not all valid python programs will be valid mojo programs. fnands|1 year ago My guess is it will end up pretty close to the C/C++ relationship, where the joke is that C++ is a superset of a subset of C. TwentyPosts|1 year ago Is anyone surprised by this? Chris Lattner in high regard, sure, but I always expected them to have to quietly walk this one back.It just didn't seem feasible, for a lot of reasons.Of course, how feasible it sounded will depend on your interpretation of "superset". I wonder what was the straw that broke the camel's back. ErikBjare|1 year ago Not really surprising that it won't be a strict superset
robinsonrc|1 year ago Not so much 'Clarify meaning of "superset of Python"' as 'Remove references to "superset of Python"'
echoangle|1 year ago So it won’t be a real superset, and not all valid python programs will be valid mojo programs.
fnands|1 year ago My guess is it will end up pretty close to the C/C++ relationship, where the joke is that C++ is a superset of a subset of C.
TwentyPosts|1 year ago Is anyone surprised by this? Chris Lattner in high regard, sure, but I always expected them to have to quietly walk this one back.It just didn't seem feasible, for a lot of reasons.Of course, how feasible it sounded will depend on your interpretation of "superset". I wonder what was the straw that broke the camel's back.
robinsonrc|1 year ago
echoangle|1 year ago
fnands|1 year ago
TwentyPosts|1 year ago
It just didn't seem feasible, for a lot of reasons.
Of course, how feasible it sounded will depend on your interpretation of "superset". I wonder what was the straw that broke the camel's back.
ErikBjare|1 year ago