[admax88qqq]

> I'm convinced computers are much better at it, but lawyers suffice.

This is just wrong though. The effect of the law is only what humans determine it to be.

Computers can't be better at it by definition. If a computer claims a law says one thing but a judge/court determines the other, the judge wins because the law is a human system.

[immibis]

similar to what the crypto people tried with smart contracts. I can unconditionally have a token that says I own a pizza, but it doesn't mean I own a pizza.

[vanviegen]

Sure, but a computer may be better than a lawyer at predicting what a judge might say.