top | item 41949925 (no title) greensh | 1 year ago from the article:> The ruling doesn’t change the underlying statute making it illegal to share or sell tools that bypass software locks.I think this also includes sharing code. discuss order hn newest unknown|1 year ago [deleted] bebrbrhrj|1 year ago Is it trite to ask if this is blocking free speech? delroth|1 year ago This has recently been challenged in courts and rejected: https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2024/08/federal-appeals-court-...> Integral to the Court’s decision was the conclusion that Section 1201’s ban on circumvention of access restrictions is a regulation of “conduct” rather than “speech.” load replies (1)
bebrbrhrj|1 year ago Is it trite to ask if this is blocking free speech? delroth|1 year ago This has recently been challenged in courts and rejected: https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2024/08/federal-appeals-court-...> Integral to the Court’s decision was the conclusion that Section 1201’s ban on circumvention of access restrictions is a regulation of “conduct” rather than “speech.” load replies (1)
delroth|1 year ago This has recently been challenged in courts and rejected: https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2024/08/federal-appeals-court-...> Integral to the Court’s decision was the conclusion that Section 1201’s ban on circumvention of access restrictions is a regulation of “conduct” rather than “speech.” load replies (1)
unknown|1 year ago
[deleted]
bebrbrhrj|1 year ago
delroth|1 year ago
> Integral to the Court’s decision was the conclusion that Section 1201’s ban on circumvention of access restrictions is a regulation of “conduct” rather than “speech.”