> But the jury awarded [...] $250 in damages - the statutory minimum for infringement in the United States.
> Apple's attorneys told the court the "ultimate purpose" of its lawsuit was not money, but to win an injunction against sales of Masimo's smartwatches after an infringement ruling.
Based on this intent, Masimo's statement:
> Masimo touts the jury’s ruling as a victory as Apple failed to win an injunction.
$250 in damages is the statutory minimum for infringement in the United States.
> Apple's attorneys told the court the "ultimate purpose" of its lawsuit was not money, but to win an injunction against sales of Masimo's smartwatches after an infringement ruling.
pizza234|1 year ago
> Apple's attorneys told the court the "ultimate purpose" of its lawsuit was not money, but to win an injunction against sales of Masimo's smartwatches after an infringement ruling.
Based on this intent, Masimo's statement:
> Masimo touts the jury’s ruling as a victory as Apple failed to win an injunction.
is appropriate.
borski|1 year ago
> Apple's attorneys told the court the "ultimate purpose" of its lawsuit was not money, but to win an injunction against sales of Masimo's smartwatches after an infringement ruling.
On this point, they lost.
notatoad|1 year ago
soul_grafitti|1 year ago