[ta93754829]

we keep moving the goalposts, and that's not a bad thing.

remember when Doom came out? How amazing and "realistic" we thought the graphics were? How ridiculous that seems now? We'll look back at ChatGPT4 the same way.

[Mistletoe]

Or is ChatGPt4 4k TV, which is good enough for almost all of us and we are plateauing already?

https://www.reddit.com/r/OLED/comments/fdc50f/8k_vs_4k_tvs_d...

[nradov]

For the work that I do, ChatGPT accuracy is still garbage. Like it makes obvious factual errors on very simple technical issues which are clearly documented in public specifications. I still use it occasionally as it does sometimes suggest things that I missed, or catch errors that I made. But it's far from "good enough" to send the output to co-workers or customers without careful review and correction.

I do think that ChatGPT is close to good enough for replacing Google search. This is, ironically, because Google search results have deteriorated so badly due to falling behind the SEO spammers and much of the good content moving off the public Internet.

[dartos]

There’s absolutely room for improvement. I think models themselves are plateauing, but out interfaces to them are not.

Chat is probably not the best way to use LLMs. v0.dev has some really innovative ideas.

That’s where there’s innovation to be had here imo.

[crackalamoo]

I don't think we're at a plateau. There's still a lot GPT-4 can't do.

Given the progress we've seen so far with scaling, I think the next iterations will be a lot better. It might even take 10 or even 100x scale, but with increased investment and better hardware, that's not out of the question.