(no title)
huggingmouth | 1 year ago
That said, I agree that peer to peer will never be seemless thanks mostly to said abusive isps.
huggingmouth | 1 year ago
That said, I agree that peer to peer will never be seemless thanks mostly to said abusive isps.
kelnos|1 year ago
No NAT, sure, that's great. But no firewalls? That's not great. Lots of misconfigured networks waiting for the right malware to come by...
theamk|1 year ago
If some ISPs are not currently firewalling all incoming IPv6 connections, it's a major security risk. I hope some security researcher raises boise about that soon, and the firewalls will go closed by default.
immibis|1 year ago
Firewalling goes back in the control of the user in most cases - the other day we on IRC told someone how to unblock port 80 on their home router.
1oooqooq|1 year ago
apitman|1 year ago
justahuman74|1 year ago
It became a problem precisely the moment AWS starting charging for ipv4 addresses.
"IPv4 will cost our company X dollars in 2026, supporting IPv6 by 2026 will cost Y dollars, a Z% saving"
There's now a tangible motivator for various corporate systems to at least support ipv6 everywhere - which was the real ipv6 impediment.
Residential ISP appear to be very capable of moving to v6, there are lots of examples of that happening in their backends, and they've demonstrated already that they're plenty capable of giving end users boxes the just so happen to do ipv6.
immibis|1 year ago
ElijahLynn|1 year ago
https://aws.amazon.com/blogs/aws/new-aws-public-ipv4-address...