[maxrecursion]

"Most teams/products I have been involved in, the stack always grows to the point that a dev can no longer test it on their own machine"

Isn't this problem solved by CICD? When the developer is ready to test, they make a commit, and the pipeline deploys the code to a dev/test environment. That's how my teams have been doing it.

[jrockway]

This turns a 1 hour task into a 1 day task. Fast feedback cycles are critical to software development.

I don't quite understand how people get into the situation where their work can't fit on their workstation. I've worked on huge projects at huge tech companies, and I could run everything on my workstation. I've worked at startups where the CI situation was passing 5% of the time and required 3 hours to run, that you can now run on your workstation in seconds. What you do is fix the stuff that doesn't fit.

The most insidious source of slowness I've encountered is tests that use test databases set to fsync = on. This severely limits parallelism and speed in a way that's difficult to diagnose; you have plenty of CPU and memory available, but the tests just aren't going very fast. (I don't remember how I stumbled upon this insight. I think I must have straced Postgres and been like "ohhhhhhhhh, of course".)

[d_sem]

It's likely you haven't come across these use cases in your professional career, but I assure you its very common. My entire career has only seen projects where you need dozen to hundreds of CPU's in order to have a short feedback loop to verify the system works. I saw this in simple algorithms in automotive, to Advanced Driver Assistance Systems and machine learning applications.

When you are working on a software project that has 1,000 active developers checking in code daily and require a stable system build you need lots of compute.

[worthless-trash]

You just need faster tests. ;)

Also, if you're booting kernel or device drivers you need the hardware. Some of this is not desktop hardware.

[baq]

When you want to run the whole test suite, yes.

When you're developing and only need to touch 0.1% of the product and 0.001% of the code, that's a total and complete waste of time.