This is largely in anticipation of the devastating drop in revenue if Google can no longer pay them to be the default search engine. That's where they get 86% of their revenue [0].
He should go start a competitor. I have a company name suggestion for him, maybe he can call it "Courage", it's a very cool hipster name for a browser startup.
Unfortunately in the world of OSS, neither of those are enough to pay the bills unless you have a lucrative partnership (i.e. Google paying to be the default search engine in Firefox, which is now no longer the case).
I don't know why they chase other products when they could take both of those and have some sort of premium additions to charge for. I pay for my mail clients, my calendar clients, and would pay for a browser with extra features / extensions.
Focus on the things people are using and not on becoming a VPN provider.
That said I like, and use, Firefox for all of my work related tasks. And I have nothing against them having "too many employees". A non-profit providing jobs is not a bad thing and feels like the best of both worlds.
Lots of people confusing the Mozilla Foundation, the non-profit that "steers" the Mozilla mission, with the Mozilla Corporation, which is the for-profit that makes Firefox. They're two different organizations: the Foundation has literally nothing to do with Firefox.
The Foundation is a tiny org that until yesterday I'd have described as "working on living the Mozilla manifesto through advocacy and programs". How it's going to stay relevant without its advocacy staff is a complete mystery to me.
How sad. Who will pickup the baton for the advocacy that Mozilla is abandoning, Internet Archive may have to forfeit ...
Why are all these projects having problems at the same time, as the economy booms?
> “Navigating this topsy-turvy, distracting time requires laser focus — and sometimes saying goodbye to the excellent work that has gotten us this far because it won’t get us to the next peak,” wrote Syed
Brave, the people that took Chromium and shoved it full of cryptocurrency ads and a few other open source projects?
You can have whatever preference you want, but I don't believe there's that much of a difference between Firefox and Blockchain Firefox, other than that Firefox actually maintains its own engine at least.
alach11|1 year ago
[0] https://fortune.com/2024/08/05/mozilla-firefox-biggest-poten...
jowea|1 year ago
eigenspace|1 year ago
Or does the for-profit arm fund the non-profit?
TheRealPomax|1 year ago
deburo|1 year ago
Wow. Are they serious? that’s illegal?
b3ing|1 year ago
Onavo|1 year ago
pjmlp|1 year ago
minimaxir|1 year ago
lancesells|1 year ago
Focus on the things people are using and not on becoming a VPN provider.
That said I like, and use, Firefox for all of my work related tasks. And I have nothing against them having "too many employees". A non-profit providing jobs is not a bad thing and feels like the best of both worlds.
mmooss|1 year ago
TheRealPomax|1 year ago
The Foundation is a tiny org that until yesterday I'd have described as "working on living the Mozilla manifesto through advocacy and programs". How it's going to stay relevant without its advocacy staff is a complete mystery to me.
nulbyte|1 year ago
That said, agreed, I'm not sure what's left for the foundation to do without advocacy staff.
unknown|1 year ago
[deleted]
mmooss|1 year ago
Why are all these projects having problems at the same time, as the economy booms?
> “Navigating this topsy-turvy, distracting time requires laser focus — and sometimes saying goodbye to the excellent work that has gotten us this far because it won’t get us to the next peak,” wrote Syed
What is topsy-turvy for Mozilla?
_xiaz|1 year ago
andrewinardeer|1 year ago
dangobanned|1 year ago
[deleted]
jeroenhd|1 year ago
You can have whatever preference you want, but I don't believe there's that much of a difference between Firefox and Blockchain Firefox, other than that Firefox actually maintains its own engine at least.
bdjsiqoocwk|1 year ago