top | item 42072490 (no title) sattoshi | 1 year ago Moot point because Trudeau basically banned all news from being shared on Facebook discuss order hn newest bhouston|1 year ago > Moot point because Trudeau basically banned all news from being shared on FacebookYou can still follow individual reporters posting their own content. For example I can access both https://www.instagram.com/wizard_bisan1/ or https://www.instagram.com/clarissawardcnn/, etc.But I can not access the organization pages like https://www.instagram.com/cnn/ throw1230|1 year ago Trudeau didn't ban news on FB, FB banned news posted to Canada because they don't want to pay publishers. sattoshi|1 year ago Surrounded by scandals, Trudeau passed a law that had an oh-so-unintentional side-effect of hiding news from many people’s primary news source.It’s hard to not be cynical about it. load replies (2) shiroiushi|1 year ago Expecting Facebook or Google to pay publishers is like going back in time to 1970 and saying that a newsstand should be paying newspaper publishers for the privilege of selling their papers. load replies (1) not2b|1 year ago No. Canada passed a law requiring Facebook to pay news media for links. Meta said no, we aren't going to do that and banned news instead.You can argue that this was a predictable response by Meta or that it was a stupid law, but it was not a ban.
bhouston|1 year ago > Moot point because Trudeau basically banned all news from being shared on FacebookYou can still follow individual reporters posting their own content. For example I can access both https://www.instagram.com/wizard_bisan1/ or https://www.instagram.com/clarissawardcnn/, etc.But I can not access the organization pages like https://www.instagram.com/cnn/
throw1230|1 year ago Trudeau didn't ban news on FB, FB banned news posted to Canada because they don't want to pay publishers. sattoshi|1 year ago Surrounded by scandals, Trudeau passed a law that had an oh-so-unintentional side-effect of hiding news from many people’s primary news source.It’s hard to not be cynical about it. load replies (2) shiroiushi|1 year ago Expecting Facebook or Google to pay publishers is like going back in time to 1970 and saying that a newsstand should be paying newspaper publishers for the privilege of selling their papers. load replies (1)
sattoshi|1 year ago Surrounded by scandals, Trudeau passed a law that had an oh-so-unintentional side-effect of hiding news from many people’s primary news source.It’s hard to not be cynical about it. load replies (2)
shiroiushi|1 year ago Expecting Facebook or Google to pay publishers is like going back in time to 1970 and saying that a newsstand should be paying newspaper publishers for the privilege of selling their papers. load replies (1)
not2b|1 year ago No. Canada passed a law requiring Facebook to pay news media for links. Meta said no, we aren't going to do that and banned news instead.You can argue that this was a predictable response by Meta or that it was a stupid law, but it was not a ban.
bhouston|1 year ago
You can still follow individual reporters posting their own content. For example I can access both https://www.instagram.com/wizard_bisan1/ or https://www.instagram.com/clarissawardcnn/, etc.
But I can not access the organization pages like https://www.instagram.com/cnn/
throw1230|1 year ago
sattoshi|1 year ago
It’s hard to not be cynical about it.
shiroiushi|1 year ago
not2b|1 year ago
You can argue that this was a predictable response by Meta or that it was a stupid law, but it was not a ban.