[brightlancer]

> S230 is flawed,

Yes.

> and it must be amended, updated, or replaced with a better version that addresses common grievances.

That assumes it will be "better" and less flawed. To that point:

> In my subjective experience, I would prefer to see S230’s protections “scale” with the size of the platform and its function. For instance (and I know this will be a highly controversial take), I don’t think large, centralized platforms like FB or X should have S230 protections at all, because

sec230 in its current form is better than every "reform" I hear suggested.