top | item 42111314

VMware Fusion and Workstation Are Now Free for All Users

79 points| WalterSobchak | 1 year ago |blogs.vmware.com

47 comments

order

ngetchell|1 year ago

Nice try Broadcom! I gave virt-manager a try and am happy to have made the switch.

I'll never install a VMware product again.

veidr|1 year ago

Please elaborate. Are these products likely dead now that Broadcom bought VMWare?

I still use both, but only for VMs on Mac and Windows, which is not how I normally run VMs. (That being KVM/QEMU on Linux.)

evanjrowley|1 year ago

virt-manager is amazing and yet it kind of boggles my mind that its 1) depreciated in RHEL8, and 2) hasn't had an official release since 2022.

miah_|1 year ago

Instead of waiting for the rug pull, just use something open source.

gosub100|1 year ago

I gave up on VirtualBox because their sound broke one day and never got fixed. Switching to qemu wasn't a breeze but it wasn't a debacle either. Just found the right args and saved it as a script

burnt-resistor|1 year ago

After endless PR blunders, they're trying to lure back customers probably with a spam platform or freemium nonsense. Nope, they shat the bed and now they have to sleep in it.

ksec|1 year ago

Even their Pro version are free. So are they basically abandoning the project and giving it away?

evanjrowley|1 year ago

Literally a few days ago I was on their website trying to figure out how I could possibly get a commercial license just to test an OVA. Going through sales, convincing my manager to make a PO, and going through the expense reimbursement process is a lot of hoops to jump through just to test a virtual machine.

onoke|1 year ago

I am using VirtualBox. Who will be happy about this? Server Hosting providers?

weikju|1 year ago

Server hosts are already using vsphere or some other products. The produced being made free are intended for desktop usage.

self_awareness|1 year ago

> I am using VirtualBox. Who will be happy about this? Server Hosting providers?

One group would be macOS users who want to virtualize ARM64.

delsarto|1 year ago

See also VMware Workstation Shifting from Proprietary Code to Using Upstream KVM (https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42013032) which I'm sure plays into this too ...

A while ago (like ~10 years ago) VMWare workstation, or some of the things virtualbox graphics drivers did, seemed to be the only reasonable ways to run a virtualised desktop with 3d or at more than 5fps. But these days virtio and spice seems to work just fine.

egberts1|1 year ago

After Broadcom's incredible zeal at killing their prized goose that lays golden eggs, they are killing it to a point of beating a dead horse.

evoke4908|1 year ago

Can we kill the goose again? Maybe harder this time

exsomet|1 year ago

My number one choice for desktop hypervisor on Linux would be virtualbox, except that unity mode hasn’t worked in years and that’s my most needed feature.

It feels like a weird spot to be in that there’s a bunch of competing options and all of them have weirdness or broken features (no slight to the people building these - far be it from me to complain about free stuff).

pjmlp|1 year ago

VMware Workstation was my go to for "Desktop Linux", nowadays I use WSL, and most likely this is the main reason it is now free, before getting the axe eventually.

self_awareness|1 year ago

Each time you run WSL, you help MS with the first "E" in embrace-extend-extinguish sequence.

tiffanyh|1 year ago

What's the best alternative?

(since so many people in this thread think this is the end of VMware)

486sx33|1 year ago

“The paid versions of these offerings – Workstation Pro and Fusion Pro – are no longer available for purchase. ”

486sx33|1 year ago

…”Once your current contract concludes, you can continue using the product. However, please note that support ticketing for troubleshooting will no longer be available.”