In theory, it is designed to be resistant to being partial to any one side. And is pretty decent at it. However, being a social system it can be gamed, and sometimes is gamed.
Community notes are not impartial, they are written and approved by the users who sign up to do so (and actually take the time to do this unpaid labor).
Thus, they tend to reflect the biases of the kind of people who most want to (and have time to) write and approve community notes, drawn from the pool of people who use your site.
It works quite well in practice. The unapproved notes are a bit all over the place in terms of bias and or being wrong but the ones that get enough votes to be shown are mostly fairly factually correct.
abdullahkhalids|1 year ago
fwip|1 year ago
Thus, they tend to reflect the biases of the kind of people who most want to (and have time to) write and approve community notes, drawn from the pool of people who use your site.
aeternum|1 year ago
By your definition those also must not be impartial and maybe that is a fair definition but what does it imply?
Do you similarly distrust democratic outcomes, jury decisions, etc.?
tim333|1 year ago
mlboss|1 year ago
cringelibs|1 year ago
[deleted]