(no title)
harisec | 1 year ago
I have one question regarding your ARC Prize competition: The current leader from the leaderboard (MindsAI) seems not to be following the original intention of the competition (fine tune a model with millions of tasks similar with the ARC tasks). IMO this is against the goal/intention of the competition, the goal being to find a novel way to get neural networks to generalize from a few samples. You can solve almost anything by brute-forcing it (fine tunning on millions of samples). If you agree with me, why is the MindsAI solution accepted?
versteegen|1 year ago
Remove "neural networks". Most ARC competitors aren't using NNs or even machine learning. I'm fairly sure NNs aren't needed here.
> why is the MindsAI solution accepted?
I hope you're not serious. They obviously haven't broken any rule.
ARC is a benchmark. The point of a benchmark is to compare differing approaches. It's not rigged.
Borchy|1 year ago
fchollet|1 year ago
And yes, they do use a lot of synthetic pretraining data, which is much less interesting research-wise (no progress on generalization that way...) but ultimately it's on us to make a robust benchmark. MindsAI is playing by the rules.