(no title)
tightbookkeeper | 1 year ago
- school administration
- rifle manufacturer
- the shooters mother (home insurance)
- other journalists who wrote about the event
I don’t know exactly what compensation they should get, but this does not seem like a healthy or sustainable way for our society to deal with tragedy.
icegreentea2|1 year ago
The suit against the school administration was eventually dismissed (the families lost on appeal) (https://www.newstimes.com/news/article/Two-Sandy-Hook-famili...). I agree it seemed kinda dubious, and I think the right outcome happened here.
The suit against Remington ended in a settlement, probably because Remington didn't want a chance in hell to set any legal precedent. The fact that the families got settlements is really a symptom of how unsettled the issue of gun control is in America. Like it's completely inane that it's fully legal to manufacture and sell AR-15 rifles to basically anyone, BUT that somehow marketing them to civilians is inappropriate. Remington settled because they just don't want any possibility of the status quo moving against them.
tightbookkeeper|1 year ago
sofixa|1 year ago
I don't know if it's healthy or sustainable, but it definitely sounds healthier than ignoring the tragedy altogether.
oddevan|1 year ago
tightbookkeeper|1 year ago
The people who are responsible are dead.
multjoy|1 year ago
In the absence of that, what else would you propose?
tightbookkeeper|1 year ago
Not suing others for millions or billions and spreading misery. Nothing can bring those kids back.
Maybe the government could have offered education and employment guarantees to the families?
> only country
Want to list some other things only the US has?
consteval|1 year ago
I don't know, this, to me, is the proper set of incentives. Nobody wants to lose money, so you better do everything you can to prevent these tragedies. If we just sob a little and move on, the systems in place will not change.
KerrAvon|1 year ago
tightbookkeeper|1 year ago