top | item 42147277 (no title) barleyworth | 1 year ago I doubt you'd call it "fake news" if a corporate acquisition was announced, just because the deal hadn't yet passed regulatory approval.But then again, you clearly seem to have a dog in this fight. discuss order hn newest swat535|1 year ago Announcing something that hasn't happened yet makes it false.The correctly should be something like "The Onion is attempting to buy Infowars" barleyworth|1 year ago Right, but one wonders why the parent commenter is not gleefully commenting about "fake news" on all of these articles: https://hn.algolia.com/?q=google+buysThis seems to be a notable story and doesn't need nakedly partisan hair-splitting. unknown|1 year ago [deleted]
swat535|1 year ago Announcing something that hasn't happened yet makes it false.The correctly should be something like "The Onion is attempting to buy Infowars" barleyworth|1 year ago Right, but one wonders why the parent commenter is not gleefully commenting about "fake news" on all of these articles: https://hn.algolia.com/?q=google+buysThis seems to be a notable story and doesn't need nakedly partisan hair-splitting.
barleyworth|1 year ago Right, but one wonders why the parent commenter is not gleefully commenting about "fake news" on all of these articles: https://hn.algolia.com/?q=google+buysThis seems to be a notable story and doesn't need nakedly partisan hair-splitting.
swat535|1 year ago
The correctly should be something like "The Onion is attempting to buy Infowars"
barleyworth|1 year ago
This seems to be a notable story and doesn't need nakedly partisan hair-splitting.
unknown|1 year ago
[deleted]