And then you read the abstract and realize that this is an improvement of an earlier result using five polygons (which in turn built on a history of earlier results).
So, still a great result, but not as out there as one may think.
I think it's also worth pointing out that in theoretical CS and most of math, it is common to list authors alphabetically. I don't think we have a way of knowing the relative contribution of the two authors. Demaine is obviously accomplished, but I find the kind of hero worship found in this thread distasteful and the facts don't support it here. Give credit to Langerman; Demaine surely would!
I understand the idea behind that phrasing but I'm not sure I agree with it. Are you no longer a child prodigy once you turn 18? I don't think I'd ever say "former intelligent child".. Would I?
The author gave a talk on this at Tufts during the FWCG last week. Fascinating talk.
One interesting question from audience was whether the ratio between the largest polygon piece and the smallest piece can be made bounded, as the current construction has unbounded ratio.
[+] [-] xianshou|1 year ago|reply
Then you realize it was this guy: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Erik_Demaine
[+] [-] atq2119|1 year ago|reply
So, still a great result, but not as out there as one may think.
I think it's also worth pointing out that in theoretical CS and most of math, it is common to list authors alphabetically. I don't think we have a way of knowing the relative contribution of the two authors. Demaine is obviously accomplished, but I find the kind of hero worship found in this thread distasteful and the facts don't support it here. Give credit to Langerman; Demaine surely would!
[+] [-] _Donny|1 year ago|reply
His lectures are absolute gold. He explains everything so clearly, simply, and efficiently.
I started skipping lectures in favor of watching his videos, and it saved me countless of hours -- and I got a perfect mark :)
[+] [-] fuzzythinker|1 year ago|reply
[+] [-] heavensteeth|1 year ago|reply
I understand the idea behind that phrasing but I'm not sure I agree with it. Are you no longer a child prodigy once you turn 18? I don't think I'd ever say "former intelligent child".. Would I?
[+] [-] unknown|1 year ago|reply
[deleted]
[+] [-] YoumuChan|1 year ago|reply
One interesting question from audience was whether the ratio between the largest polygon piece and the smallest piece can be made bounded, as the current construction has unbounded ratio.
[+] [-] whatshisface|1 year ago|reply
[+] [-] petters|1 year ago|reply
[+] [-] joebergeron|1 year ago|reply
[+] [-] bryan0|1 year ago|reply
[+] [-] romwell|1 year ago|reply
[+] [-] TeenGirlza17|1 year ago|reply
[deleted]