(no title)
caspg | 1 year ago
At least 95% of the code was generated by AI (I reached the limit so had to add final bits on my own).
caspg | 1 year ago
At least 95% of the code was generated by AI (I reached the limit so had to add final bits on my own).
MrMcCall|1 year ago
negoutputeng|1 year ago
POCs and demos are easy to build by anyone these days. The last 10% is what separates student projects from real products.
any engineer who has spent time in the trenches understands that fixing corner cases in code produced by inexperienced engineers consumes a lot of time.
in fact, poor overall design and lack of diligence tanks entire projects.
ericskiff|1 year ago
There’s a daily 2.5 million token limit that you can use up fairly quickly with 100K context
So they may very well have completed the whole program with Claude. It’s just the machine literally stopped and the human had to do the final grunt work.
trash_cat|1 year ago
What stops you from using AI to explain the code base?
unknown|1 year ago
[deleted]
ipaddr|1 year ago
I can't think of a worse llm than Claude.
7thpower|1 year ago
fragmede|1 year ago