top | item 42185308 (no title) 9999px | 1 year ago US and NATO personnel, equipment and cash have been in Ukraine for almost a decade now. Operation Sea Breeze couldn't have happened otherwise. discuss order hn newest red-iron-pine|1 year ago not sure why this is downvoted, it's 100% correct. more specifically, a lot of NATO support following Euromaidan and "separatist" fighting 2014-2015.after a few black eyes fighting the Little Green Men, the AFU leaned hard on NATO assistance for training and armament.it's why the Ukrainians held out against Russia, and why Russia struggled so much -- they thought they were fighting the 2015 AFU, not the 2022 AFU. lostmsu|1 year ago It's probably downvoted because they put "personnel" first, but we all know the number of NATO soldiers in the conflict is essentially 0. load replies (1)
red-iron-pine|1 year ago not sure why this is downvoted, it's 100% correct. more specifically, a lot of NATO support following Euromaidan and "separatist" fighting 2014-2015.after a few black eyes fighting the Little Green Men, the AFU leaned hard on NATO assistance for training and armament.it's why the Ukrainians held out against Russia, and why Russia struggled so much -- they thought they were fighting the 2015 AFU, not the 2022 AFU. lostmsu|1 year ago It's probably downvoted because they put "personnel" first, but we all know the number of NATO soldiers in the conflict is essentially 0. load replies (1)
lostmsu|1 year ago It's probably downvoted because they put "personnel" first, but we all know the number of NATO soldiers in the conflict is essentially 0. load replies (1)
red-iron-pine|1 year ago
after a few black eyes fighting the Little Green Men, the AFU leaned hard on NATO assistance for training and armament.
it's why the Ukrainians held out against Russia, and why Russia struggled so much -- they thought they were fighting the 2015 AFU, not the 2022 AFU.
lostmsu|1 year ago