The technical reason was that uBlock Origin uses the "Manifest V2" extension interface. The new "Manifest V3" standard ever-so-coincidentally doesn't provide the tools necessary for thorough ad-blockers like UBO.
You should switch to a browser that maintains support for good ad-blockers.
A nasty and likely intentional side effect of using these workarounds is that your browser becomes "managed" and it blocks the ability to configure DNS for example. Deal breaker for me
There's no good technical reason why ublock and similar addons are being un-supported, merely Google's whims. If a non-advertising company buys it they won't have any reason to go through with this.
I can only imagine that there will be a whole new can of worms though, trying to maintain a technically complex project with no revenue stream, likely loss of a lot of the core developers, and chaotic management.
It might well recover and turn into a fine project. In the meantime though, firefox seems like the best bet whether chrome is removed from Google or not.
Probably not. I'd reckon even the other corporate donors and contributors to Chromium apart from Google will be in favor of Manifest V3 and killing content blockers.
AFAIK there are no Chrome uBlock alternatives, while there is a Chrome alternative with uBlock, Firefox. Beside that, you can set
"ExtensionManifestV2Availability" = 3;
as see https://chromeenterprise.google/policies/ apparently till June 2025 to keep Manifest v2 extensions like uBlock fully working, I've rebuilt my NixOS with Chromium this morning and uBlock was there so it's not removed at least if you have the aforementioned option set.
It is the hobbled version of uBlock origin, missing features.
It may do about the same for general ad blocking now. But, advertisers are now aware there's much less potential to drive people to heuristic-capable ad blockers because that now requires more than "install this plugin".
So now, they can be more aggressive about going around ad blockers.
The move to the API seems motivated more by keeping the ad profitability model up than being about technical/security reasons. While I'm glad we're not in the IE4 vs. web standards days anymore, with Edge now also being on Chromium-base, there's too many interests in that one hot spot. How did the old saying go? Power corrupts, absolute power ...
I don't think that's a good idea, it should be a separate, ideally hardwired device (or VM on a host with an Ethernet connection).
But I wonder if you could run the PiHole (or Technitium, or AdGuard Home, etc) in a container with Podman or Compose, and set your DNS to 127.0.0.1? I feel like that would create some kind of feedback loop.
peutetre|1 year ago
https://github.com/gorhill/uBlock/wiki/uBlock-Origin-works-b...
endgame|1 year ago
You should switch to a browser that maintains support for good ad-blockers.
MR4D|1 year ago
This behavior just pisses me off. “Don’t do evil”, my ass.
tech234a|1 year ago
moderation|1 year ago
nemomarx|1 year ago
thekevan|1 year ago
pcdoodle|1 year ago
solardev|1 year ago
gpm|1 year ago
There's no good technical reason why ublock and similar addons are being un-supported, merely Google's whims. If a non-advertising company buys it they won't have any reason to go through with this.
I can only imagine that there will be a whole new can of worms though, trying to maintain a technically complex project with no revenue stream, likely loss of a lot of the core developers, and chaotic management.
It might well recover and turn into a fine project. In the meantime though, firefox seems like the best bet whether chrome is removed from Google or not.
dartharva|1 year ago
kadoban|1 year ago
kkfx|1 year ago
bdangubic|1 year ago
chris_wot|1 year ago
Funes-|1 year ago
modzu|1 year ago
TiredOfLife|1 year ago
In my couple week usage it's the same in blocking as uBlock Origin.
tyingq|1 year ago
It may do about the same for general ad blocking now. But, advertisers are now aware there's much less potential to drive people to heuristic-capable ad blockers because that now requires more than "install this plugin".
So now, they can be more aggressive about going around ad blockers.
_blk|1 year ago
HKH2|1 year ago
ChrisArchitect|1 year ago
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41809698
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41757178
gnat|1 year ago
quickslowdown|1 year ago
But I wonder if you could run the PiHole (or Technitium, or AdGuard Home, etc) in a container with Podman or Compose, and set your DNS to 127.0.0.1? I feel like that would create some kind of feedback loop.
duringmath|1 year ago
_blk|1 year ago
magundu|1 year ago