[Hedepig]

> then it is a correct formula to say 'it's not "true reasoning"'

why is that point fundamental?

[mdp2021]

Because the same way you do not want a human interlocutor to speak out of its dreams, uttering the first ideas that come to mind unvetted, and you want him to instead have thought hard and long and properly and diligently and well, equally you'll want the same from an automation.

[Hedepig]

If we do figure out how to vet these thoughts, would you call it reasoning?