Downloading the big ones is so slow even over a semi-decent connection, it feels like getting certain lowres images in 1995 over a modem :-) What a blast from the past!
I'm not affiliated, but I've been seriously debating it for a long time. The photo is a composite of the sun and the sun's heliosphere from the 2017 eclipse. One of my favorite images of the Sun.
Big fan of Andrew McCarthy's work, been following him on IG for a few years now. The stuff he's able to pull off as a backyard astrophotographer is very impressive.
The scale and violence of the processes that drive the Sun are really mind-blowing. 43 million km away and it's getting on for 20kW per square metre. Edit: the probe is that far from the sun.
Fun fact: if the Solar System had an atmosphere that stretched from the Sun to the Earth (at least) then the sound of the Sun from Earth would be ~100dB.
IIRC the Sun converts ~4.5 million tons of mass into energy every second and even then, there are objects that are trillions of times more energetic/violent. The first LIGO detection I believe converted 5 Solar masses into energy in about a second.
The scale/mass of the sun is just fascinating. It takes ~500,000 years for a photon released in the fusion process to escape the core. That's just how dense the core is that a photon gets bounced around that much. The fact that the outer layer (corona up to 3,500,000°F is so much hotter than the surface(photosphere around 10000°F) that is on top of the core (around 27,000,000°F) is just another one of those weird to appreciate as well.
I think it's crazy how little impact this giant constantly exploding ball of turbulent plasma has on our day to day lives. We get consistent light and heat, and occasional auroras... and that's it? This thing has enough energy to wipe out every last trace of human existence.
Only 20kw per square meter on the surface of the sun ? How come it is so low ?
We receive about 1kw of sunlight per square meter on Earth, and earth is 149M km from the sun. From napkin math, it should rather be ~45MW/sqm on the sun to receive 1kw/sqm on Earth (surface of the sphere of radius 149M km divided by surface of the sun gives ~45000, so 1 watt from the sun becomes 1/45000 watt when it reaches the Earth)
Have people wondered about a possibility of an advanced life form hiding inside a star? It doesn't seem easy, but there'd be an abundance of energy, and the less advanced life forms are unlikely to interfere.
> The process took more than four hours, since the spacecraft had to change position for each individual photograph. In the final mosaics, the sun’s diameter is almost 8,000 pixels across.
I'm guessing this is sort of equivalent to manual supersampling rather than combining adjacent (ie visually translated to the next subsquare of the photo) viewpoints? Four hours is a pretty short time for 48 million miles of distance.
Edit: well considering orbital velocity I guess they probably just zigzag'd perpendicular to the orbital plane?
Is there no PNG or JPG? A lot of these space photos make nice backgrounds, but they're increasingly being displayed in weird zoomable only on a web page galleries
"Resolution" is used very loosely here. They are very big images of the full Sun (in terms of the number of pixels), but there are also various telescopes that "zoom in" much more on a small part of the Sun, resulting in images with much higher details than the ones from this article.
I’m astounded by how plain and round the visible light images are. Why is the corona only visible in the UV images, if it is, according to the article, visible from earth?
it’s wild that we have all this data but we don’t really know what any of this stuff actually is (celestial bodies overall not just the sun) only what radiations they give off that we can read and recognize, for all we know stars are the outer shell of a multidimensional being and the heat is just an effect of us not being able to ascend dimensionally in order to pass into it because it’s “above” spacetime and attempting to pass through means transcending into an eternal realm which we of course would be vaporized because our matter is in this dimension, or it could be (insert anything, we may never know!)
[+] [-] zamadatix|1 year ago|reply
Visible: https://eopro.esa.int/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/PHI_Visible...
Magnetogram: https://eopro.esa.int/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/PHI_Magneto...
Velocity map: https://eopro.esa.int/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/PHI_Velocit...
Ultraviolet: https://eopro.esa.int/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/EUI_Ultravi...
[+] [-] exodust|1 year ago|reply
I couldn't resist blending the visible with ultraviolet in Photoshop, here's the result: https://imgur.com/a/vRGav2d
I did a quick clean up of the hard edges, but didn't want to push pixels too much.
[+] [-] ra120271|1 year ago|reply
https://eopro.esa.int/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/
[+] [-] limaoscarjuliet|1 year ago|reply
https://eopro.esa.int/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/PHI_Visible...
[+] [-] djsavvy|1 year ago|reply
[+] [-] mikae1|1 year ago|reply
[+] [-] jeleh|1 year ago|reply
https://x.com/AJamesMcCarthy/status/1638648459002806272
by
Andrew McCarthy: https://www.instagram.com/cosmic_background/
Jason Guenzel: https://www.instagram.com/thevastreaches/
[+] [-] cornstalks|1 year ago|reply
I'm not affiliated, but I've been seriously debating it for a long time. The photo is a composite of the sun and the sun's heliosphere from the 2017 eclipse. One of my favorite images of the Sun.
[+] [-] sans_souse|1 year ago|reply
[+] [-] PittleyDunkin|1 year ago|reply
[+] [-] IAmGraydon|1 year ago|reply
[+] [-] casenmgreen|1 year ago|reply
[+] [-] static_motion|1 year ago|reply
[+] [-] incognito124|1 year ago|reply
[+] [-] grues-dinner|1 year ago|reply
[+] [-] jmyeet|1 year ago|reply
IIRC the Sun converts ~4.5 million tons of mass into energy every second and even then, there are objects that are trillions of times more energetic/violent. The first LIGO detection I believe converted 5 Solar masses into energy in about a second.
[+] [-] dylan604|1 year ago|reply
[+] [-] itishappy|1 year ago|reply
[+] [-] eleveriven|1 year ago|reply
[+] [-] popol12|1 year ago|reply
We receive about 1kw of sunlight per square meter on Earth, and earth is 149M km from the sun. From napkin math, it should rather be ~45MW/sqm on the sun to receive 1kw/sqm on Earth (surface of the sphere of radius 149M km divided by surface of the sun gives ~45000, so 1 watt from the sun becomes 1/45000 watt when it reaches the Earth)
Where am I wrong ?
[+] [-] onemoresoop|1 year ago|reply
[+] [-] unknown|1 year ago|reply
[deleted]
[+] [-] KineticLensman|1 year ago|reply
er, 149 million km away [0] not 43
[0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sun
[+] [-] brcmthrowaway|1 year ago|reply
[+] [-] dmitshur|1 year ago|reply
[+] [-] hydrolox|1 year ago|reply
[+] [-] fritzo|1 year ago|reply
[+] [-] corytheboyd|1 year ago|reply
[+] [-] eleveriven|1 year ago|reply
[+] [-] dryrun|1 year ago|reply
[+] [-] bmurphy1976|1 year ago|reply
[+] [-] va1a|1 year ago|reply
[+] [-] M_bara|1 year ago|reply
[+] [-] throwaway290|1 year ago|reply
[+] [-] AlphaEsponjosus|1 year ago|reply
[+] [-] Bengalilol|1 year ago|reply
[+] [-] PittleyDunkin|1 year ago|reply
I'm guessing this is sort of equivalent to manual supersampling rather than combining adjacent (ie visually translated to the next subsquare of the photo) viewpoints? Four hours is a pretty short time for 48 million miles of distance.
Edit: well considering orbital velocity I guess they probably just zigzag'd perpendicular to the orbital plane?
[+] [-] maplant|1 year ago|reply
[+] [-] Larrikin|1 year ago|reply
[+] [-] User23|1 year ago|reply
[+] [-] gsliepen|1 year ago|reply
[+] [-] dukeofdoom|1 year ago|reply
[+] [-] 7373737373|1 year ago|reply
[+] [-] lumb63|1 year ago|reply
[+] [-] unknown|1 year ago|reply
[deleted]
[+] [-] luxuryballs|1 year ago|reply
[+] [-] LetsGetTechnicl|1 year ago|reply
[+] [-] ano-ther|1 year ago|reply
[+] [-] _7acn|1 year ago|reply
[+] [-] eleveriven|1 year ago|reply