top | item 42220846 (no title) colleagueRiley | 1 year ago Sure, but none of these are true alternatives because they are missing a lot of features that libraries like GLFW or RGFW have.(They may be good alternatives for certain use-cases) discuss order hn newest Sharlin|1 year ago Oh, just based on the README I assumed RGFW was more minimal than it actually is. colleagueRiley|1 year ago Minimal refers to the code itself.GLFW's codebase is ~10MB while RGFW's is about ~300kb. But RGFW tries to support nearly everything that GLFW supports. load replies (1)
Sharlin|1 year ago Oh, just based on the README I assumed RGFW was more minimal than it actually is. colleagueRiley|1 year ago Minimal refers to the code itself.GLFW's codebase is ~10MB while RGFW's is about ~300kb. But RGFW tries to support nearly everything that GLFW supports. load replies (1)
colleagueRiley|1 year ago Minimal refers to the code itself.GLFW's codebase is ~10MB while RGFW's is about ~300kb. But RGFW tries to support nearly everything that GLFW supports. load replies (1)
Sharlin|1 year ago
colleagueRiley|1 year ago
GLFW's codebase is ~10MB while RGFW's is about ~300kb. But RGFW tries to support nearly everything that GLFW supports.