[olliej]

Alternatively the Supreme Court wants to issue an ruling that says invading people's privacy for profit, or to provide it to political parties, is legal and therefore not subject to lawsuits or legal challenges in future.

[SauntSolaire]

> Alternatively the Supreme Court wants to issue an ruling that (...)

According to the article, the supreme court actually declined to issue a ruling in this case. Curious if that causes you to update your beliefs in any manner.

[zeroonetwothree]

But it’s much easier to comment immediately with my preconceived notions than to actually read the article and risk that it disagrees with them.