top | item 42228444

(no title)

mkotowski | 1 year ago

I got curious if I can get data to answer that, and it seems so.

Based on xlsx from [0], we got the following ??d? localities in Poland:

1 x Bądy, 1 x Brda, 5 x Buda, 120 x Budy, 4 x Dudy, 1 x Dydy, 1 x Gady, 1 x Judy, 1 x Kady, 1 x Kadź, 1 x Łada, 1 x Lady, 4 x Lądy, 2 x Łady, 1 x Lęda, 1 x Lody, 4 x Łódź, 1 x Nida, 1 x Reda, 1 x Redy, 1 x Redz, 74 x Ruda, 8 x Rudy, 12 x Sady, 2 x Zady, 2 x Żydy

Certainly quite a lot to search for a lost package.

[0]: https://dane.gov.pl/pl/dataset/188,wykaz-urzedowych-nazw-mie...

discuss

order

jplrssn|1 year ago

Interesting! However, assuming that ASCII characters are always rendered correctly and never as "?", it seems like the only solution for "??d?" would be one of the four Łódźs?

schubart|1 year ago

Sounds like someone is getting ready for Advent of Code!

ctm92|1 year ago

Łódź seems to be the only one translating to ??d?, all others have normal ASCII characters in the places 1, 2 and 4

yreg|1 year ago

Experienced postal workers most probably know well that ??d? represents a municipality with three non-ascii characters.

poincaredisk|1 year ago

Interestingly, Lady, Łady and Lądy will end up the same after the usual transliteration.

account42|1 year ago

That's (one reason) why postal codes exist. Dunno about Poland, but town names here are not unique to begin with.

ozornin|1 year ago

So, transliteration to "Lady", "?ady" and "L?dy" respectively seems to work even better in this case than "Lady"