[peterkos]

That's a pretty egregious mistake for a designer to make -- and that's not even mentioning the lack of accessibility. WebAIM's contrast checker says it's a 1:1 contrast ratio!

If someone is releasing a model that claims to have a level of reasoning, one would hope that their training dataset was scrutinized and monitored for unintended bias (as any statistical dataset is susceptible to: see overfitting). But if the graph on the announcement page is literally unreadable to seemingly anyone but the creator... that's damning proof that there is little empathy in the process, no?

[parhamn]

> that's damning proof that there is little empathy in the process, no?

No.

[hmottestad]

I wouldn’t say it’s implied, but there’s a reason people put on nice clothes for an interview.

I’m looking at the graphs on my phone and I’m pretty sure that there are 5 graphs and 3 labels. And their 8B model doesn’t seem to be very good, looks like a 20B model beats it in every single benchmark.