[glup]

There's this one GitS (SAC I think) UI thing that I think about pretty often: a bot needs to work faster so its fingers pop open revealing a huge number of additional cursed sub-fingers, such that it can type on a keyboard massively faster. I love thinking of this as such a wonderfully naive early 2000's view on HCI — there's no direct-access data API, the bot needs to use the keyboard so.... more actuators!! How much of technology has this same flavor?

[woolion]

This hands thing, there's a literal note in the manga about it. The man is an old neuro-scientist, but new brain implants that allow for direct CPU connectivity is something that only young neuro-surgeons are familiar with. For this reason, this man doesn'n't want a man who could be his child to operate direcly on his brain. However, the productivity boost because of the brain implant creates a gap between humans and augmented humans, so this is the solution this man found to work around his refusal to get the brain implant, and so it is clear that it is a fairly bad solution that only exists because of this human "motivation". The two points are some of the major themes that are explored in depth.

I would recommend reading Masamune Shirow's original work (it's only 2 volumes!), as you could argue that the adaptations are merely shells of the original.

On the one hand, the Mamoru Oshii movie version is a 'best of' the cool moments from the original, but it bends the narrative very strongly to express Oshii's POV rather than Shirow's. It's not as bad as in people modernizing Tolkien for example, it's more in line with how Kubrick's version of "A Clockwork Orange" differs from Anthony Burgess' original (which I also recommmend reading). On the other hand, the SAC (Stand Alone Complex) series more closely match Shirow's POV and ambience, it's not as deep, but it's really an impressive feat considering it's all original scenarii, and how entertaining it is.

[jumpoddly]

The original manga is great

Worth noting that it is way more horny than the anime

Also, love Kubricks adaptation of clockwork orange, but burgess hated it and caused him to hate his own original work later in life

He even made a play with him and Kubrick as characters to talk about how much he hated the whole experience

One major change was the ending, burgess’s original has 21 chapters, and in the 21st the main character rediscovers his humanity and seeks a life of creating art

Kubrick stops his adaptation at the conclusion of chapter 20

Hilariously, the publisher behind the first US print of A Clockwork Orange removed the 21st chapter to make the novel more controversial so it would sell more

If you read clockwork definitely make sure it is the full version with all 21 chapters!

[portaouflop]

Thanks for sharing that!

imo the manga is often better the the anime adaption even if they replicate everything 1:1

A bit off topic but I found the text version of clockwork orange very hard to read and not nearly as entertaining as the movie - still an impressive piece of art.

[dleeftink]

Thanks for the recommends!

[lloeki]

Not SAC, the original GitS movie.

> I love thinking of this as such a wonderfully naive early 2000's view on HCI — there's no direct-access data API

Even in original GitS, both cyborgs and bots have wired neck ports and can also communicate wirelessly, both subject to various kinds of attacks. Even if not intended, this typing may constitute a legit airgap defense.

[amatecha]

Wow, that's an angle I had absolutely not thought of before. Of course they "could" just jack right in, but that's probably forbidden -- the only permitted interface is the keyboard? Maybe? That's pretty intriguing!

[notpushkin]

There was a nice reference to that scene in the Pantheon series: an “uploaded” human (basically an emulated brain with a software human-based avatar) learns he can interact with other pieces of software directly, but can't put his mind to it yet. He does modify his avatars’ fingers in a GitS-like fashion, though, to everyone’s amusement.

Pantheon (2022–2023): https://m.imdb.com/title/tt11680642/

[LoganDark]

Was just about to mention this also. Pantheon is great! So many tech industry references and parodies...

[johnchristopher]

In minority report there's a scene (https://youtu.be/NwVBzx0LMNQ?t=43) in a forensic/detective office in which MC swipes data and info on the screen (hologram ?) with their hands. Then at some point another character moves a physical object (data drive ?) from one desk to another and at first I am thinking "yeah, right.. no network to move data from one screen to the other, uh ?".

But then I remind myself of this passage from Virtual lights (Gibson):

> Was it significant that Skinner shared his dwelling with one who earned her living at the archaic intersection of information and geography? The offices the girl rode between were electronically conterminous-in effect, a single desktop, the map of distances obliterated by the seamless and instantaneous nature of communication.

> Yet this very seamlessness, which had rendered physical mail an expensive novelty, might as easily be viewed as porosity, and as such created the need for the service the girl provided. Physically transporting bits of information about a grid that consisted of little else, she provided a degree of absolute security in the fluid universe of data.

> With your memo in the girl's bag, you knew precisely where it was; otherwise, your memo was nowhere, perhaps everywhere, in that instant of transit.

[keiferski]

One of the key themes in GITS is the interaction between biological and computer systems. Those rapidly typing fingers are probably the perfect physical metaphor for exploring that idea: how one could maximize data transfer between a physical/biological input system and a computer one.

[discordance]

That was in the original Ghost in the Shell (nswf):

https://youtu.be/x-zUAb_ndDk

[GauntletWizard]

The full movie is free on Youtube (In the US, anyway): https://youtu.be/iHil4Y4r3Wk

And a link directly to that scene: https://youtu.be/iHil4Y4r3Wk?t=2748 and the other time they show it: https://youtu.be/iHil4Y4r3Wk?t=3297

Moreover, this almost makes sense as a security mechanism. A keyboard is a one-way input device; You don't get feedback from it. A monitor provides feedback that's fuzzy - Harder to exploit via a visual image where you're expecting and parsing text than a direct digital link.

[crabmusket]

What's most shocking about that scene is not the typing speed, but being able to think of the code to write that quickly!

[hombre_fatal]

I've seen similar comments about that scene over the years but I don't get it.

How is it naive?

It's clearly creative license to be more interesting and provocative. They could have just made his eyes glow and stuff happen on screen, but that wouldn't have been as cool.

[woolion]

This is not an example of the "rule of cool", there's a human and technological point that is made by this scene. However, because the movie drops most of the context from the original work, it is only something visually striking and impressive for most people. In-universe, this is considered almost nonsensical technology (for the obvious reasons that are invoked here).

[hks0]

I don't think OP finds it not cool; otherwise he would had forgotten the scene long ago.

[el_cujo]

Yeah I think that kind of thing isn't supposed to be "predictive". The "rules" in series aren't very clear, sometimes they type stuff out into a keyboard, sometimes they connect a cable from their head, sometimes they just pass stuff around/hack basically just just "telepathically" without even needing the wire, they do whatever seems cool for a scene. I think the "splitting fingers" thing happens in one of the movies but also in SAC, but I think the point is just that it looks interesting and seeing the fingers do that and start suddenly typing quickly gives a sense of tension/urgency that you wouldn't get if it was just the character sitting back and staring at the screen (even if "in universe" they're able to work just as effectively that way)

[gwern]

> I love thinking of this as such a wonderfully naive early 2000's view on HCI

Not really so naive when you look into 'robotic process automation' https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robotic_process_automation . Huge industry, and can be just moving a mouse around on a screen and triggering keyboard inputs. If robot hands were cheap and dexterous enough...

[makeitdouble]

I assume the naive part is that the keyboard polling interface probably doesn't allow that much input ?

Otherwise yes, we do this kind of approach so much irl. The most useful kind is the Switch it's button actuator, that will just push a button when making it "smart" is just impossible or not worth it.

The less useful kind is what the Rabbit R1 was trying to do, with website interaction automation in a full VM because each service wouldn't provide an API.

[pavlov]

On the Enterprise-D in “Star Trek: The Next Generation”, they don’t have WiFi or any other kind of local wireless except for voice calls.

So when the android Data needs to access some information, he reads it from a GUI terminal, but at 1000x speed.

(It seems like the iPad-like touchscreen tablets don’t have WiFi either because they are frequently used to “sneakernet” information inside the ship.)

[MrLeap]

Think about it from an animator's point of view. What's more fun, plugging a cable in or typing your heart out? There's a whole dotted outline where I could put a plug for my indie game...

[yjftsjthsd-h]

I'm sure there's something to be said for the visual appeal, but I think they actually did justify it in universe as an isolation mechanism; physically using a keyboard means no BadUSB or such.

[binary132]

Presumably the cybernetic typing mechanism is for enhanced access to terminals not equipped for direct machine interface. :)

[floydnoel]

... or as an interface to an actively hostile/compromised device!

[cbanek]

I've always loved that scene in particular, I know exactly the one you're talking about.

[devjab]

Maybe it’s just the artist way of acknowledging that nothing is ever going to be faster than VIM?

[gyomu]

The goal of interfaces in the real world is to help people perform tasks quickly/efficiently, without error (and to easily recover when errors are made).

The goal of interfaces depicted in movies/media is to look cool.

(Sadly too many designers do not understand this)

[wodenokoto]

The line between “cool” and “ridiculous” isn’t always that broad.

In order to look at this and think “wow, that’s so cool, now it can type super fast” I do I agree that you need some nativity to not think “why not just plug in?”

Although, on second thought, maybe you need some pessimism and think “that’s a cool way to deal with incompatible ports and apis”