top | item 42292167

(no title)

wunderland | 1 year ago

What "lawfare"? How was Hunter unfairly targeted here?

discuss

order

Terr_|1 year ago

> I’m trying to imagine how I would have reacted if, back when I was a supervisor at the Southern District of New York, another prosecutor had come to me with this pitch:

> "We’ve got this case on a guy who had a gun almost five years ago. He was a drug addict at the time, and he lied about that when he filled out some forms to buy the gun. He had the gun for 11 days, nobody ever fired it or used it to do anything, and it wound up getting tossed in a trash can. The guy has had major drug issues and ugly familial problems, but no prior convictions. "

> I would have had two immediate questions. First: What’s the crime? Second: Don’t we have better things to do?

https://nymag.com/intelligencer/article/why-hunter-bidens-pr...

harambae|1 year ago

> and he lied about that when he filled out some forms to buy the gun

My cousin went to jail for 6 months for this exact crime and he’s neither famous nor connected to anyone. (Granted, they caught him at the time it didn’t take years.)

impossiblefork|1 year ago

The trash can bit is actually a bit scary though.

It means he did not keep control of the weapon.

bediger4000|1 year ago

Oh come on. If Trump gets to plead lawfare, then Hunter certainly is a victim of it.

Just to be generous, I'll cite Hunter Biden's plea deal that almost went through, but got rejected at the final moment. That's lawfare, plain and simple, a consequence of Republicans trying to do a Benghazi on Biden.

limit499karma|1 year ago

Another reading would see this "lawfare" narrative as a device to fool the citizenry. Both sides know they will get pardoned but by having "lawfare" give the impression (to the impressionable and propagandized public) that we do not have in this nation a ruling class that protects its own and does as it pleases.