After publication of Spectres, I don't know if there much interest anymore on Hats. Spectres are like Hats, but eliminate the need of reflections for tiling.
> It also complicates the practical application of the hat in some decorative contexts, where extra work would be needed to manufacture both a shape and its reflection
And people say that mathematical research has no practical applications
Next frontier: aperiodic tilings with irrational angles (meant, tiles having angles of x*2pi were x is irrational). Or are these proven to be impossible?
Because both the hats and spectres are basically subset of triangular grid. Penrose tilings are subset of regular grid, too. Can we get rid of these underlaying regular grids.
Interestingly this was found by a “hobbyist tiler”, David Smith, who is the first author. He was interviewed on how he found it in this YouTube video: https://youtu.be/4HHUGnHcDQw?si=VsHLqVUdw6ihERg2
Something that is unclear to me: are hat reflections allowed? I think they are, but it would be good to have confirmation. In short, if you allow reflections, are the tilings still guaranteed to be aperiodic?
zokier|1 year ago
https://cs.uwaterloo.ca/~csk/spectre/
nhatcher|1 year ago
I did a write up with some app you can play with a while ago:
https://www.nhatcher.com/post/on-hats-and-sats/
Gare|1 year ago
And people say that mathematical research has no practical applications
gilleain|1 year ago
rini17|1 year ago
Because both the hats and spectres are basically subset of triangular grid. Penrose tilings are subset of regular grid, too. Can we get rid of these underlaying regular grids.
zem|1 year ago
ganzuul|1 year ago
yayamo|1 year ago
joelthelion|1 year ago
shrx|1 year ago
bluepoint|1 year ago
bradrn|1 year ago
mkesper|1 year ago
unknown|1 year ago
[deleted]