I'm not entirely convinced that ego-less is even a better way of doing things. Sure, the ego can go overboard but it also gives a sense of drive and direction. It isn't just the bad stuff. Without it, there's nobody taking ownership of the design or it's just designed by an apathetic committee.
worksonmymach|1 year ago
Ego would be making sure you got "your" sprint tickets done, did no code reviews, skipped the retro. I think few people do that but they will if Goodhart's Law happens.
itishappy|1 year ago
oscillonoscope|1 year ago
For practical purposes, if you don't acknowledge how good and bad behaviors can both spring from the same base emotions/thought processes then it's harder to grow out of the bad behaviors. You need to be able to reframe how the ego interacts with your work, not just try to kill it off.
MrMcCall|1 year ago
It's a tricky business, being a human being, with its very many pitfalls.
kookamamie|1 year ago
Thus, it's never a balanced setup where everyone's happily working towards a shared vision in equilibrium.
There's always someone having a larger incentive than the other person, overriding their decisions in a haste, in order to reach a bonus objective.
Welcome to the real World driven by capitalism.