[rabbitfang]

Fact: C is faster than Go:

http://shootout.alioth.debian.org/u32/benchmark.php?test=all...

Fact: Python is more expressive than Go (less code):

http://shootout.alioth.debian.org/u32/benchmark.php?test=all...

If I wasn't interested in Go I wouldn't complain about not having binaries. You may not be running RHEL 5.0 but there are many organizations which still have many systems on it. It's not always up to Joe Developer to decide to upgrade the OS on every box in an organization. Perhaps I need to know more about building go to compile my own binaries, but not having to deal with C is one of the reason's I was looking at Go in the first place.

How is this FUD? C is faster than Go, Python takes less code than Go and the binaries don't support RHEL 5.0. I thought my post wasn't particularly biased, but I'm pretty shocked at the reaction I got :(

[kev009]

There is compound failure at your organization as running _5.0_ is reckless and dangerous.

[rabbitfang]

You do realise that security patches are still being provided for even RHEL 3? https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/rhel3els-errata.html

[hell0_th3r3]

you seem to be presenting a false dichotomy. can't go be a success in some place in between c and python?

my haskell is faster than python and more expressive. therefore you should stop using python immediately, right? of course not, because anyone using the shooutout to make sweeping generalizations has of course read the massive disclaimer warning against that...

[rabbitfang]

Go does fall somewhere between the two, which is what I was getting at. Whether that's a good or a bad thing was what I hadn't made my mind up about. I like the idea of something that's expressive and fast, my thoughts are currently that it could to be more expressive.