top | item 42319745 (no title) aphantastic | 1 year ago So not “anti-vax” but rather “pro-choice”. discuss order hn newest llamaimperative|1 year ago "anti-vaccinating people at the scale required to yield good public health outcomes" is sufficient to qualify for the label, IMO. noworriesnate|1 year ago To be fair, vaccinating all humans, dogs, cats and other animals that can carry COVID-19 was never going to happen before the virus mutated, so you could also apply the label to reality itself. load replies (1)
llamaimperative|1 year ago "anti-vaccinating people at the scale required to yield good public health outcomes" is sufficient to qualify for the label, IMO. noworriesnate|1 year ago To be fair, vaccinating all humans, dogs, cats and other animals that can carry COVID-19 was never going to happen before the virus mutated, so you could also apply the label to reality itself. load replies (1)
noworriesnate|1 year ago To be fair, vaccinating all humans, dogs, cats and other animals that can carry COVID-19 was never going to happen before the virus mutated, so you could also apply the label to reality itself. load replies (1)
llamaimperative|1 year ago
noworriesnate|1 year ago