top | item 42320391

(no title)

sleno | 1 year ago

What are the tradeoffs to something like this? What attack vectors are still present and what attack vectors does this prevent? Thanks, cool project!

discuss

order

jgiraldo29|1 year ago

Thank you so much. Now let me break this questions down:

Key Security Benefits:

1. Cryptographic Verification:

- Prevents silent corruption of system state

- Makes tampering with system logs cryptographically difficult

- Provides verifiable audit trails of all system operations

- Enables detection of hardware memory faults

2. Runtime Integrity:

- Prevents invalid memory access patterns

- Ensures filesystem operations maintain consistency

- Verifies process state transitions

- Guards against buffer overflows in key subsystems

Main Tradeoffs:

1. Performance Impact: - 3-5% overhead for memory operations

- 7-9% overhead for filesystem operations

- Additional storage needed for proof chains

- Increased memory usage for verification structures

2. Complexity: - More complex memory management

- Additional failure modes to handle

- Higher system initialization overhead

- More complex recovery procedures

Attack Vectors Still Present:

- Physical hardware attacks (DMA, cold boot)

- Side-channel attacks

- Race conditions (though reduced by verification)

- Attacks that operate within valid operation boundaries

- Core CPU/firmware-level vulnerabilities

Attack Vectors Prevented/Mitigated:

- Memory corruption exploits

- Filesystem integrity attacks

- Unauthorized state transitions

- Historical state tampering

- Many types of privilege escalation

Im actively working on making the other attack vectors disappear as a whole. It's quite extensive as it is, so it's got a lot of things packed on it. ( * ´ ω ` * )